TaylorMade Files Lawsuit Against Costco Over Kirkland Signature Irons
News

TaylorMade Files Lawsuit Against Costco Over Kirkland Signature Irons

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

TaylorMade Files Lawsuit Against Costco Over Kirkland Signature Irons

Yesterday, TaylorMade filed a lawsuit against Costco Wholesale and Southern California Design Company over willful patent infringement in regards to Costco’s new Kirkland Signature Players Irons.

Amongst the myriad of accusations made on TaylorMade’s behalf to Costco and SCDC is the assumption that the Kirkland Signature Irons “copy many features and technologies from TaylorMade’s P790 irons and the asserted patents.”

Who is SCDC?

Southern California Design Company is believed to be the manufacture of Costco’s Kirkland golf clubs. The lawsuit states that “SCDC designed and manufactures the accused products for Costco and sells the accused products to Costco. On information and belief, the accused products are made by or at the direction of SCDC and/or Costco in the United States, or are imported into the United States by or at the direction of SCDC and/or Costco.”

Based on the conforming list, SCDC can also be tied to the brand name Indi Golf.

Other Accusations

Among other initial claims is the claim that Costco’s irons do not in fact contain injected urethan inserts. According to the lawsuit, the urethan insert is nowhere to be found.

“Costco’s website listing the accused products for sale states that “[t]he Kirkland Signature Players Distance Irons are built for distance and forgiveness with a[n] … injected urethane insert. The accused products, however, do not contain an “injected urethan insert.””

What’s Next?

TaylorMade has requested a jury trial. If Costco and SCDC were found to have willingly infringed on TaylorMade’s patents and/or participated in false advertising of the accused products, they could be on the hook for a large chunk of change.

Once we hear more, you’ll be the first to know.

For You

For You

News
May 1, 2024
Five U.S. Buddy Golf Trips That Won’t Break The Bank
News
May 1, 2024
Best Public Golf Courses Near NYC
First Look
May 1, 2024
Tiger, TaylorMade are Officially in Their Sun Day Red Era
Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor is MyGolfSpy's resident sneakerhead who believes that golf is more enjoyable with a fresh pair of kicks. When he isn't scrolling Twitter to find his next golf shoe purchase, you can find him at the piano or trying a new dessert place with his wife. #Lefty

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      BJ

      2 months ago

      That said…. fraud is still FRAUD!
      Too much of that going on in this country now! It needs to STOP!

      Reply

      Will

      4 weeks ago

      How many lawsuits is TM involved with others, for the exact same thing, they’re crying about. See Adams Golf, PXG. I hope Costco wins, then just maybe the prices can drop from the others.
      PS I’m playing the Signature wedges, and I love them

      Reply

      Top Jimmy, He's the King!

      2 months ago

      Every company copied designs by Ralph Maltby. He sues no one. They know it, but won’t ever admit it. He was the 1st to put a weight inside at the bottom of the iron and use foam filling inside. King Solomon was right, there is nothing new under the sun, just a bunch of copycats. His K4 max wedges play way better than the ones I’ve paid a king’s ransom for in the past. After 10 rounds, they still look brand new! My M6s looked like crap after 2 rounds!

      Reply

      Patrick Renaud

      3 months ago

      I must agree with the many who believe that TM spends way too much on marketing relative to R&D. Start a spreadsheet of their costs including paying Pros to do adds, providing Pros equipment and clothing at no costs to the Pros, and paying for the too many ads on TV, and other media. We amateurs are paying for all this “fluff” that TM uses to convince us that their equipment is better than anyone else’s. But, the other major brands like; Ping, Callaway, Titliest, etc… are doing exactly the same thing. TM is suing COSTCO for all the OEMs really. A test case to keep their profits high and our wallets empty. And, the world turns.

      Reply

      Tony Figueroa

      3 months ago

      Why they don’t sue Ali Express or Temu?

      Reply

      Tom Dirkland

      3 months ago

      What will Costco say to the lack of a urethane injection when they advertise that the clubs have been injected? Or is it ok since they keep the price so much cheaper?

      Reply

      Carl

      2 months ago

      Is it urethan or urethane? Why is it spelled differently? The Costco clubs certainly do not contain urethan, since that isn’t a th9

      Reply

      Frank B

      3 months ago

      TaylorMade does have a case. They have spent millions in research and testing to develop their design. If Costco is infringing on their intellectual property (patents, etc), then they are basically counterfeit clubs. Sure, I’d like to buy cheaper golf clubs too, but nobody would spend money developing products if it were legal for somebody else to just copy them.

      I guess the answer will come down to if the TM can prove their patents are being infringed on???

      Reply

      What’s good for the goose

      3 months ago

      Adams Golf sued TM for the same reasons and to fix the problem TM bought Adams and took all their good tech and then kicked Adams to the curb. No tears for TM.

      Reply

      Owen

      3 months ago

      That’s the first thing I was thinking….didn’t Taylormade steal tech from Adams?

      Sammy ☘️ Lane

      2 months ago

      I was thinking the exact same thing!!’

      Will

      4 weeks ago

      Here here

      Tom Matheson

      2 months ago

      Taylormade is known for suing other companies for things that they themselves copied from someone else and did not license. They are big enough in the world of golf to either buy (Adams Golf) or countersue and throw so many lawyers at the problem it eventually goes away.

      In any case, this is essentially Taylormade’s legal argument “Costco and SCDC are infringing on our patents by using a hollow iron design filled with urethane.” Also, Taylormade “Costco and SCDC are selling a hollow iron that is not filled with urethan.”

      So, which is it Taylormade? It’s either infringing because it is filled with urethane and you claim to “own” that patent (unlikely since you settled with PXG over a similar lawsuit they filed against you) or they are just plain hollow irons that aren’t infringing on any patents.

      Reply

      Chris Harrell

      3 months ago

      Well, I guess TM is feeling some competition from a big box retailer. Maybe that speaks highly of the Kirkland brand. I’ve never tried the Kirkland clubs but their golf balls are really good.

      Reply

      Dave H.

      3 months ago

      Does TM really think they can take on Costco? I would think their legal budget dwarves what TM has.

      Reply

      Alan Scalzi

      3 months ago

      Wow!! We MyGolfSpy asked us to do a survey on this topic of the Kirkland irons and my question was how much research was put into making them!!!! Will find out soon enough.

      Reply

      Peejer

      3 months ago

      Do you not remember when Titleist sued Costco over the 4-piece urethane ball? Those disappeared forever and we got a lesser golf ball.
      Maybe the same will happen with these irons? Part of the out-of-court settlement will be to stop making them and they’ll come out with a lesser club.

      FYI – I still have a sleeve of the original 4-piece urethane, kind of a collector’s item for me!

      Reply

      Andy

      2 months ago

      Costco basically recalled the 4 piece ball due to quality. It wasn’t related to a lawsuit

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      2 months ago

      Actually, you’re both right.

      There was a sue/countersue over the original 4-piece and the Kirkland Signature Guarantee with Acushnet arguing something along the lines of Costco suggesting the quality of the ball meets or exceeds that of the industry leader was false advertising.

      Costco later released a 2nd 4-piece ball that was quickly recalled over durability issues with the cover.

      John DeArc

      3 months ago

      TM trying this BS because Costco’s popularity can actually take sales away. If it were Wilson, Cleveland and the like TM wouldn’t do anything. TM should lose this suit as golf club makers have been using each others “technology” forever. Only reason people buy new clubs is because they have the money to blow on stupid BS.

      Reply

      tehuti

      3 months ago

      As a recreational golfer I would support Costco or the DTC companies who are selling to guys like me at reasonable prices.

      Reply

      Travis

      3 months ago

      Costco has regularly infringed on other products from many companies and I hope Taylormade gets deep into Costco’s wallet on this one. Just like Titleist did.

      Reply

      cp

      3 months ago

      can you show us on a doll where costco hurt you?

      Tom Matheson

      2 months ago

      Titelst didn’t win that lawsuit. The reason the original 4-piece balls disappeared is that Costco purchased leftover stock from Nassau and when that stock ran out they were gone. Also, Taylormade bought Nassau. The newer Kirkland balls are made in China.

      J Compton

      2 months ago

      Just like Titleist did? Can you cite the reference showing exactly how much Titleist received in their lawsuit? I don’t expect you can. Look at the % profit margin Costco earns vs what % Titleist earns to see which is gouging the customer more. BTW, Tailor-made was once sued by Adams for doing what they accuse Costco of doing, if memory serves. Interesting, no?

      Brian Parkinson

      3 months ago

      Thanks Taylor Made. Before I wanted to try the Kirkland iron. Now I REALLY REALLY want to try the Kirkland iron.

      Reply

      J.C. Lopez

      3 months ago

      Right?! I still might do a direct to consumer brand like Takomo though.

      Reply

      Rob W.

      3 months ago

      Walking the story back, since P-790’s “borrowed heavily” from PXG. So the $10,000,000 was paid for by Parsons. TM & later on Kirkland are really selling the $5 clubs. The difference being their expected profit margin (or as some would call it greed). I understand the advertising expenses for TM prolly dwarf their manufacturing & R&D expenses. I’m just surprised they kind of said it out loud.

      Reply

      Larry

      3 months ago

      What is the possibility the plant making the Kirkland club also makes Taylormade clubs? Just like the first Kirkland ball was made in a ball plant that made Taylormade balls ( I think Taylormade owns that ball plant now in Taiwan )

      Reply

      HikingMike

      3 months ago

      From what I’ve read (from other random online people), it’s not the same place.

      Reply

      Mitty the golf expert

      3 months ago

      Bwahahaha. Way to go TM, looking real good. Lets face it all the OEM’s are scared of losing market share to a company like Costco the 800 lb gorilla in the room, they can’t compete with paid members that are buying $4.99 rotisserie chickens and packaged vacation, no way. As for patent infringement all the OEM’s have copied each other. Very few design advancements over the past 50 years for an industry which relies on design obsolescence and a new paint scheme every other year. Completely laughable. Hey TM here’s a suggestion make an iron and call it Pinseeker with a Ram logo advertised by elderly golfer named McGregor, maybe add a retro line with a hickory shaft. LOL.

      Reply

      Rob W.

      3 months ago

      Hmmmm??? Am I the only one looking at it backwards?
      This lawsuit is basically an admission by TM that their clubs are way overpriced. If Costco can profitably manufacture and sell “their” technology for $499 and TM sells is for $1,399, TM is claiming $900 of R&D recovery.
      Thanks to another disruptor, we finally get a better idea of the insane industry markups.

      Reply

      Gus

      3 months ago

      Well, Kirkland is not paying Rory, Tiger, Korda, Fleetwood, etc…. This is where the overprice goes to, marketing.

      Reply

      danny anderson

      3 months ago

      absolute truth… the big names have gone way off the deep end with there pricing !!!!!! I hope kirkland comes out on top and everybody starts playing them!!!!

      Reply

      Kyle

      3 months ago

      I was thinking the same

      Reply

      John

      3 months ago

      Wouldn’t that be somewhat expected though. If I spend the money and time inventing the product and you just copy it, your costs would be significantly less than mine. What does research tell you Taylormade should be charging?

      Reply

      Adam

      3 months ago

      R&D for one specific product is a sunk cost. The only explanation for TM charging what they do for their irons is marketing overhead and that’s recurring. It’s exactly the reason DTC brands can make great products without charging absurd prices. The R&D costs are recouped through sales volume not price gouging because they don’t have to keep paying pros just to use their clubs.

      Larry

      3 months ago

      100% correct, It is the cost of Player contracts and advertising ( it cost a lot to have somebody come up with words that make each years new product seem better than anything before) Anyone can go to the actual people that make golf balls and clubs and buy all the balls and clubs you want with your name on them no R&D needed. Just like all the many off brand golf balls out there, many are the same ball with different markings/logos.

      Reply

      Thomas A

      3 months ago

      Just like in Pharmacuticals, the first pill cost $10,000,000. The second pill costs $5.

      Reply

      Billy-Bo-Jim-Bob-Earl

      3 months ago

      None of this will change my life one bit!

      Reply

      Dave

      3 months ago

      Remember all the years TM was stealing tech from Adams, then they finally bought them?

      Reply

      Scott

      3 months ago

      Yep. Twist face was a complete rip off from Adams.

      Reply

      MuskieCy

      3 months ago

      TM stole all of Adams technology 10+ years ago and told Barney,….”see you in court.”

      TM then made the old offer you can’t refuse to Barney(former TM head of development),….and buh-bye Adams.

      Too bad. Ten years ago Adams had crushed all the other manufacturers with tech advancement.

      Reply

      Punxsutawney Thrill

      3 months ago

      cut open the iron and let’s have a look if there’s a urethane insert!

      Reply

      HikingMike

      3 months ago

      That’s what I was going to say. They must have cut one open. Seems ridiculous if they say there is an injected urethane insert but there really isn’t. Whoops.

      Reply

      Stuart

      3 months ago

      Might be a technicality – there is an insert but they reckon its not urethane or something

      League Golfer

      3 months ago

      Or maybe it’s not “injected”. Maybe the insert is just placed inside there before they weld or combo braze the pieces together. Who knows?

      Shawn

      3 months ago

      Exactly what I want to know. Especially since I just bought a set.

      Reply

      CryptoDog

      3 months ago

      AAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
      I wish somebody would also stand up and get a class action lawsuit against TM for the bait and switch on the Qi10, that the only model with 10K is the max, and those Pros in the commercials are not using that model even though the commercials suggest that they are using a model with the 10k in it

      Reply

      Hopp Man

      3 months ago

      Won’t happen, it is called puffery and was long ago found to be legal.

      Reply

      Mike

      3 months ago

      So does that mean they are hollow? Or just something that is not urethane. Can you guys test that with the irons your tested?

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    May 1, 2024
    Five U.S. Buddy Golf Trips That Won’t Break The Bank
    News
    May 1, 2024
    Best Public Golf Courses Near NYC
    First Look
    May 1, 2024
    Tiger, TaylorMade are Officially in Their Sun Day Red Era
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.