Ball Lab – TaylorMade TP5x Ball Review
Golf Balls

Ball Lab – TaylorMade TP5x Ball Review

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Ball Lab – TaylorMade TP5x Ball Review

MyGolfSpy Ball Lab is where we quantify the quality and consistency of the golf balls on the market to help you find the best ball for your money. Today, we’re taking a look at the TaylorMade TP5X. An overview of the equipment we use can be found here. To learn more about our test process, how we define “bad” balls and our True Price metric, check out our About MyGolfSpy Ball Lab page.

TaylorMade TP5x Golf Balls

For more than a few years, I’d have argued that TaylorMade’s golf ball franchise, dating back to TP Red and Black, was the most underappreciated of any serious player in the golf ball market. It’s reasonable to put the blame for that squarely on TaylorMade. With dominance in the metalwood category first on the agenda, making waves in the ball market was of secondary or even tertiary concern.

When driver sales weren’t what they were supposed to be, the play call invariably was to pull from the ball budget to bolster the big dog.

Sad!

In more recent years, however, TaylorMade has devoted real and ongoing resources to the development and growth of the TP5 franchise. Part of its reallocation of Tour spend was to sign Rickie Fowler as its first ball- (and glove-) only ambassador. That alone should tell you TaylorMade is finally serious about the golf ball.

An honest assessment of the market suggests nobody is remotely within striking distance of the Pro V1 but with shares ticking up slightly, and admittedly projecting years down the road, I believe TaylorMade is the most serious threat to Titleist.

About the TaylorMade TP5x

Like TaylorMade’s TP5, the TP5x features five-piece construction. Across the major market as a whole, the construction is unique – every other Tour ball that matters offers either three- or four-piece construction. With more layers, theoretically, comes a greater ability to tune spin throughout the bag, though its competitors will say they accomplish the same thing with graduated core designs.

It’s also true that with more layers come more complexity and greater opportunity for things to go sideways during the manufacturing process.

TaylorMade classifies the TP5x as a high-launch, low-spin ball. Generally, those comparisons are relative to the manufacturer’s lineup, so the performance takeaway here is that it can be expected to fly higher and spin a bit less than TP5 throughout the bag.

As with the TP5, the TP5x offers a bit of an odd manufacturing story. The four inner layers are manufactured in Asia and not necessarily in the same factory. Our samples were produced in Korea. However, it wouldn’t be surprising if your box of TP5x reads differently.

TaylorMade is working towards consolidating its overseas core manufacturing. Covers are applied at TaylorMade’s golf ball plant in Liberty, S.C.

TaylorMade TP5x – Compression

A compression chart for the TaylorMade TP5x golf ball

On our gauge, the average compression of the TaylorMade TP5x is 98. That about eight points firmer than the standard TP5 and places it among the firmest balls in our database, bookended by the slightly softer RZN HS-TOUR and the ever-so-slightly-firmer Bridgestone TOUR B X.

The high-launch, low-spin characteristic paired with high compression is a recipe for distance. As with the Titleist Pro V1x Left Dash, the firm feel may not appeal to preference-driven golfers (especially seniors who like the softness of low-compression golf balls), but if maximizing distance throughout the bag is a priority, TP5x is one to consider – especially for golfers who generate greater than average spin.

TaylorMade TP5x – Weight and Diameter

  • None of the balls tested exceeded the USGA weight limit of 1.620 ounces.
  • Zero percent of the balls failed to meet our standard for roundness.
  • Six percent of the balls failed the ball track (minimum allowable diameter test) and were flagged as bad accordingly.

We’ve previously noted that TaylorMade flirts (I’d argue aggressively so) with the USGA’s minimum allowable diameter limit. In replicating the USGA’s ball track test, six percent of our sample passed through our 1.68-inch ring gauge more than the 25 percent of the time allowable under the rules. Those balls were flagged as bad.

We should note that a slightly smaller golf ball is typically a longer golf ball so, in that respect, golfers benefit when the ball is undersized. Nevertheless, the rules are the rules.

TaylorMade TP5x – Inspection

Centeredness and Concentricity

As with the TaylorMade TP5, minor defects including slightly off-center cores and visibly non-concentric layers (including incursion from an outer layer into an inner layer) were not uncommon.

We did flag two balls as bad as we felt the cores were off-center enough that there would likely be performance implications.

an image of the core of the TaylorMade TP5X

Core Consistency

Across our sample, core color was consistent from ball to ball. In two instances we found a single piece of small non-uniform material in the core. They were noted but were not considered significant enough to flag the ball as bad.

Cover

We found a single cover with some minor dimple damage. We also identified a ball where the cover was a bit thinner than the rest. Though the cover was close to the limit of what we deem acceptable, both issues fell in the minor category and neither ball was flagged as bad.

TaylorMade TP5x Consistency

In this section, we detail the consistency of the TaylorMade TP5x. It’s a measure of how similar the balls in our sample were to one another, relative to all of the models we’ve tested to date.

a consistency chart for the TaylorMade TP5x golf ball

Weight Consistency

  • Consistency (of weight) across our TaylorMade TP5x sample fell within the average range.

Diameter Consistency

  • Diameter consistency relative to the other balls in our database fell in the fair (below average range).
  • This is almost certainly, in part, due to the undersized balls found within the sample.

Compression Consistency

  • Compression consistency across the sample was good (above average).
  • The compression range across the sample of balls was just a tick over four compression points. It doesn’t get much better
  • The compression range across the three points measured on each ball (what we call the IBCR Delta) was just over one compression point on average, which is also just about as good as it gets.

True Price

True Price is how we quantify the quality of a golf ball. It's a projection of what you'd have to spend to ensure you get 12 good balls.

The True Price will always be equal to or greater than the retail price. The greater the difference between the retail price and the True Price, the more you should be concerned about the quality of the ball.

TaylorMade TP5x – Summary Report

To learn more about our test process, how we define “bad” balls and our True Price metric, check out our About MyGolfSpy Ball Lab page.

The Good

By any measure of compression consistency, our sample was excellent.

The Bad

With the TP5/5x, TaylorMade flirts with the USGA minimum size allowance to the point where it sometimes crosses the line. You never want to see an appreciably off-center core and the rate of minor defects appears higher than leading balls in the premium/Tour category.

True Price

The True Price of the TaylorMade TP5x is $50.61 per dozen. That represents a 13-percent increase over MSRP ($44.99). That’s still reasonably solid and with TaylorMade selling the TP5x for $39.99 (and retailers offering additional holiday discounts), there’s outstanding value to be had in a golf ball that’s well suited for golfers looking to cut spin while gaining speed on full shots without giving up too much around the green.

Ball Lab Top Performers

Want to know which balls have performed best in Ball Lab testing so far?

Check out:

Support Unbiased Testing.

DID YOU KNOW: If only 1% of MyGolfSpy readers donated $25, we would be able to become completely independent in 12-months. With every donation, you create change.

Would you be willing to help by giving a donation? Every dollar will help. Make a donation to support our independent and expert golf equipment research. A PayPal account is not required in order to donate.

Donate to MGS


Amount

Frequency

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Richard Branson

      3 years ago

      As a devout ProV1-x user who literally just reordered 5 dozen personalized balls, I decided to try out a sleeve of TP5x after reading the review. Must admit that I was pleasantly surprised by their overall performance, characterized by a high, penetrating ball flight with good roll out on the driver, and great stopping power when hitting irons / hybrids to the green. Moreover, I only used one ball all day and it held up exceeding well with respect to appearance and durability.

      Reply

      W

      3 years ago

      Tony, I wish you could add “Durability” to the TrueCost.
      I’m a real wedge gouge type guy and the covers on these balls are pretty weak after a round.
      They’re also noticeably more dirty and off color than others after only half a round. The shine and brightness of the balls are terrible after only a few holes.
      So in that realm, I think the True Cost gap would be way bigger as I’m swapping balls midway thru an important round with these than with previous generations. I used to be able to play the same ball at least a couple rounds but not this current one.
      This currrnt generation definitely flies farther but the cover has a lot to be desired.

      Reply

      Nakman

      3 years ago

      While True Ball Price is clever, why not focus on bad balls, so 1/13? More the concern, no?

      Reply

      Greg

      3 years ago

      I would love to see MGS test the “Practice” versions of these balls. I am curious about how different they would actually be for $19-$29 a dozen.

      Reply

      W

      3 years ago

      What’s the point? The practice ones have the off-center cores and bad sizes and bad covers. That’s why they’re sold as practice and not for playing on the course because they’ll fly funny duh

      Reply

      Mike

      3 years ago

      Comprehensive review, but I have to strongly disagree about TaylorMade becoming “#2” to Titleist. At our upscale public course (SE USA), thousands of balls are found. Among the premium brands, Pro v1s are by far the most prevalent. In second place, well behind pro v’s but WAY ahead of anything else are Chrome Softs. TaylorMade is a VERY distant third place. I know Chrome Softs have been disparaged on MGS but guys, c’mon,. Chrome Softs have made an inroads into pro v’s as no other ball has since their ince.ption. Ask anyone at the big box stores and they’ll tell you the same thing. ever since Callaway got smart and stopped changing the name of their premium ball every year the branding has gotten much stronger.

      Reply

      Matt

      3 years ago

      “Upscale public” ?

      Reply

      Mike

      3 years ago

      Just in case you’re not familiar with that term, I use it to define a course where: a) tee times cost $125 in the AM thru midday & $90thru 3pm. And unless you book in advance it’s hard to even get a tee time before twilight. Whew, Good thing I’m a member! So now hopefully you understand my definition of upscale public.

      So what’s it like being a member at Augusta National?

      W

      3 years ago

      Lots of Seniors at your course eh, who like the soft feel of those balls

      Reply

      Stevegp

      3 years ago

      Tony, thank you for the golf ball reviews. I always look forward to reading your findings. Your efforts and commentary are appreciated.
      This was one of the golf ball lab reports, among others, I was looking forward to reading. With the five-layer design and the multiple manufacturing sites, I have been wondering how they manage the quality control challenges.

      Reply

      Trusty rusty

      3 years ago

      LOve this ball, 100 rounds a year, each and every shot. Very consistent

      Reply

      Matt

      3 years ago

      I trust this ball, and have for some years,
      These are solid performers,

      Reply

      Golfinnut

      3 years ago

      I think the ProV1 left dash is a lot firmer than these. I don’t like a firm ball at all. I think the 5 layers makes it a better ball & reduces the firmness.
      I think I’ll probably get some of these again over the holidays since the price is so good.

      Reply

      Robert

      3 years ago

      I’ve played TM balls since the TP Black/Red and the latest one is the best. The previous model had a lot of issues with the center being off. I’d test out a dozen and at least 3 would have issues, but the new ones seem to have fixed that for the most part. There may be one that doesn’t float right in the salt bath. I’ve been curious for awhile to see how it would fair in these tests. I’m actually surprised there weren’t more issues.

      Reply

      Troy

      3 years ago

      I switched to the TP5x, from the Chrome Soft X after reading your article about the inconsistencies in the Calloway production. I have picked up at least 1/2 club distance and love the low spin into the greens. This article certifies why I have switched to this great ball.

      Reply

      don

      3 years ago

      note that a slightly smaller golf ball is typically a longer golf ball so, in that respect, golfers benefit when the ball is undersized. Slightly smaller sounds like a good thing until you hit it over the green because you didn’t realize this ball was slightly smaller.

      Reply

      Geoff

      3 years ago

      Big fan of this ball. Especially the “Rickie” ball. Easy to identify when multiple players have balls in the same area and helps with putting. Thanks for the article.

      Reply

      Jim Pecoraro

      3 years ago

      How would you compare this ball to the Left Dash Pro V1x? Similar enough to come down to feel? Would love to see launch and spin numbers in the next big golf ball robot test.

      Reply

      Paulo

      3 years ago

      I could be wrong but I think they’re saying this ball is firmer than the left dash? I think the left dash feels like hitting a rock, the tp5x feels fractionally softer of the two to me so it just goes to show how feel is completely subjective

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      3 years ago

      Allowances for manufacturing variances…the TP5x is about 4-compression points softer on our gauges than Left Dash.

      Jim Pecoraro

      3 years ago

      Thanks for the reply, Tony. Despite a relatively small difference in compression (98 vs. 102), I find the Left Dash to be much harder off the club on the course. Perhaps it also depends on the club being used, in my case the Srixon z785s. Not something I couldn’t get used to, but noticeably harder than the TP5x.

      As a follow up to my question on numbers, I did some testing on foresight today and found the following:

      (The wedge numbers are not typos, they were that close)
      54° Wedge (TP5x) – 97 yard carry, 82.6mph ball speed, 32.3 launch angle, 9,216 spin, 52.3 descent angle, 27 yards peak height
      54° Wedge (Left Dash) – 96 yard carry, 82.6mph ball speed, 32.4 launch angle, 9,606 spin, 52.6 descent angle, 27 yards peak height

      7-iron (TP5x) – 184 carry, 128.2mph ball speed, 18.3 launch angle, 5,682 spin, 49.2 descent angle, 39 yards peak height
      7-iron (Left Dash) – 182 carry, 126.1mph ball speed, 18.4 launch angle, 5,712 spin, 48.7 descent angle, 37 yards peak height

      I recently sold my Driver so I couldn’t get Driver numbers, but I was pretty amazed how similar the two balls performed on the monitor. I hit enough shots with each club to get 5 good ones and these were the averages. I play off 6 for reference.

      Anyway, hope that helps anyone out there comparing these two balls. Both great options.

      Cody Reeder

      3 years ago

      I look forward to every Wednesday to read these ball articles.. I appreciate the effort on these.

      Reply

      Kansas King

      3 years ago

      The narrative said none of the balls failed the roundness test but the graphic shows 6% not round which I think was meant to represent the size problems?

      Nonetheless, it looks like TM is pushing (and sometimes exceeding) the rule limits with this ball which may mean longer drivers on average. I’ve always been satisfied with TM balls and if one is just a little smaller than it should be, it probably wouldn’t stop me from buying them.

      Reply

      Cody

      3 years ago

      I think the 6% failure was due to the size being too small on a few..

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      3 years ago

      In the graphic we only show roundness and weight. The TM balls in question failed the size test, which is an entirely different thing.

      When we launched Ball Lab, we had size in the graphics as well, but we took it out after the first few because the data we’ve collected suggests size failures would be exceptionally rare.

      Nearly everything we test is close enough to (or far enough beyond) 1.68″ that we don’t need to go through the ball track exercise. Even when a ball is obviously small, the nature of the ball track test allows plenty of wiggle room for balls with average diameters well below the stated 1.68″ size to pass.

      It’s hard to put a precise number on it because it can vary based on whether the ball is well within round limits or closer to what we classify as not round, but – broad strokes here – anything with an average diameter below 1.67625″ is probably going to fail…a little bit above that, it’s probably going to fall through the gauge multiple times, but not enough times to fail the test.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.