Union Green Golf Balls
Golf Balls

Union Green Golf Balls

Union Green Golf Balls

Introducing Union Green

Even if you’ve never heard of Union Green (and I’m guessing you haven’t), its reputation precedes the launch of the brand. Union Green’s golf balls are manufactured in the USA at Titleist Ball Plant #2. It’s the same factory that churns out TrueFeel, Velocity, and Tour Soft.

That should clue you into the fact that Union Green lives under the Acushnet umbrella. It’s a not so small detail that makes the latest upstart ball brand plenty more interesting than most.

So, is Union Green Titleist?

Not exactly.

union green golf ball

At first glance, the lines between Acushnet’s ball brands may appear blurry, so let me be clear; Union Green definitely isn’t Titleist. It isn’t Pinnacle either. If not for the Acushnet copyright notice in the footer of the Union Green website, you’d likely never make the connection.

Union Green is an entirely new, different, and separate golf ball brand. The products are unique, and if things go well, its audience will be too. Union Green aspires to grow an organic, grassroots following by reaching a segment of the market to which Titleist and Pinnacle don’t hold any particular appeal – and no, I don’t mean Chrome Soft players.

Golf has the power to unite us all. Union Green is for the people who head to the first tee just as they are and love to play the game on their own terms. All are welcome.

Why Union Green?

It wasn’t all that long ago that the Sub-$30 balls accounted for about 50% of the market. At the time, Pinnacle, Nike, and Top Flite accounted for the majority of sales. As the market shifted towards higher-performing urethane balls, the sub-$30 market became fragmented. Pinnacle persists, Nike is gone, and Top Flite has become one of a few Dick’s Sporting Goods house brands. Everyone else in the ball biz offers something in the category.

At first glance, that might suggest that opportunities to grow a brand within this space are limited, but Acushnet believes Union Green has the potential to reach an audience for whom its other offerings don’t hold any particular appeal – and neither do its competitors’.

We’re not the golfers you see on tour. We’re different. The ones playing local, taking mulligans, over celebrating and always going for it. Club Championships, rule books, 18 holes every time – that’s not our game. We’re here for golf that fits our life. For fellowship. For the love of the fairway. We’re united by the game.

The Union Green (non) Golfer

Union Green is for people who play golf but don’t necessarily consider themselves golfers. It’s a group that enjoys the game, sometimes plays by the rules, sometimes not so much. Twosome, foursome, sixsome, it’s all good so long as everyone is having a good time. It’s a group without any loyalty to a particular brand. They may not even have a brand preference. We’re talking about a not-golfer for whom the undisputed #1 ball in golf is whatever I find.

Amen, brother.

Acushnet believes that Union Green will speak to the guy who feels like mainstream golf brands aren’t talking to them. If that sounds a bit like a golf brand with a lifestyle slant, there’s no need to get your hearing checked, you’ve got it.

The brand brings with it a distinctly casual vibe that’s most assuredly not Titleist.

The Union Green is as much about creating a culture as it is delivering performance. Compared to Titleist, it’s decidedly more flat brim and quite a bit less white sport coat. The Union Green vibe is cool and casual, and the intent is to appeal to a demographic for whom golf isn’t life itself, but instead is one of a varied number of excuses to hang out with friends, toss back a few beers, and have a good time. No polo shirt, no golf shoes, no problem. Dogs allowed, apparently.

Union Green Golf Balls

Union Green golf balls are high performance and high quality with absolutely no nonsense. Check out Pindrop and Teebird and make the Union a part of your next round.

The initial Union Green lineup will include two models. Both are unique to the brand; neither is a rebrand of something you can already buy.

The $19.99 Teebird is a 2-piece ball designed to maximized distance. It offers Astonishingly Long Distance, The Speed You Need, and Straight Off The Tee Flight.

The $27.99 Pindrop is a dual-core, 3-piece ball that offers more balanced performance (distance with greenside spin). Its stated benefits are Tremendous Trajectory, Pin-Dropping Accuracy, and Green-Grabbing Control.

The language reaffirms that Union Green isn’t Titleist or Pinnacle either.

union green golf pindrop

Both balls offer ionomer covers and a unique dimple pattern that’s a bit of a blend between an AVX dimple and dimple in dimple designs. There are no immediate plans for a urethane offering. I suspect that’s part of a broader strategy to maintain a comfortable distance between Union Green and Titleist.

The plan is to keep the lineup light and simple and not bog the target audience down with tech stories. You won’t find launch and spin charts on the box or in the product descriptions. The approach is all about straight-forward simplicity for a target non-golfer who isn’t obsessed with optimizing anything other than his level of fun. Union Green is for golfers (and non-golfers) looking for a no-nonsense, quality product that speaks directly to him. And yeah, a cool logo doesn’t hurt.

union green teebird

A DTC Lifestyle Brand

Fitting with the lifestyle model, Union Green offers a selection of branded merchandise – hats, t-shirts, mugs, that sort of thing.

The business plan is to sell almost entirely direct to consumer. Union Green will be available through a small number of shops – roughly 60 to 80 nationwide – that fit with the brand identity. If you paid an assessment this year, you’re not likely to find Union Green in your shop.

union green mug

Will UG Succeed?

Titleist, and I suppose Acushnet is evolving. It wasn’t long ago that a We’re Titleist, and Titleist doesn’t do that attitude created unnecessarily business barriers in a rapidly changing market. In recent years, the strategy has shifted to a model that remains true to the company’s core values, while becoming more accessible to golfers, and yes, to no small degree, part of that means leaving less money on the table. With consumer buying habits changing, Union Green makes sense from a strategy perspective.

There’s little doubt taking a lifestyle-first approach can work in golf. Travis Mathew has done it. One could argue several small shaft companies are doing it, and certainly, the appeal of the Vice brand transcends the performance of its products. You don’t have to be cool to succeed in golf, but for the Union Green audience, it certainly doesn’t hurt.

Success, however, is not a given. The challenge for Union Green is to establish an identity as an authentically casual golf brand entirely outside of the Titleist orbit. That’s a tricky proposition, but the company believes the brand is true to the people inside of Acushnet that created it. Born of a market opportunity, but genuine just the same.

union green crew t-shirt

The newly launched website nails the identity and immediately positions the brand as laid back, fun, and anything other than country club elite. Maintaining that vibe and the requisite separation from Titleist shouldn’t be a problem. While nobody is trying to keep the connection secret, the Union Green audience isn’t likely to realize or, for that matter, care about the relationship to Acushnet’s other ball brands.

Different strokes for different folks, as they say.

The Union Green golf brand launches today. For more information, visit UnionGreen.com.

For You

For You

News
May 5, 2024
Testers Wanted: Fujikura Ventus Driver Shafts
Golf Balls
May 5, 2024
Ball Lab: 2024 Titleist AVX
News
May 4, 2024
Testers Wanted: Takomo Long Game Golf Clubs
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Mike

      4 years ago

      I’m tired of hearing the phrase “grow the game”. Everyone wants to grow the game until ‘that’ foursome shows up in front of you on a weekend morning. If you want to grow the game, take someone who’s interested in golf to ‘your’ pro (or lesson place) & treat them to a lesson. I’ve done that. Then I’ve taken them out on the course on an uncrowded late afternoon. Done that too. This way they learn the game & the proper etiquette the right way. Golf isn’t a craft beer in the sense of, hey, let’s do something different today…yeah, let’s hit a golf course.

      Reply

      Bob

      4 years ago

      I get that this is a write-up by MGS and that it’s their take on a new Brand release. So why do some—including myself—take this as more of a promotional piece rather than a MGS covering news? Frankly, it’s the images MGS used for the article. They are from UG’s website/instagram, and they are professionally made to advertise product.

      Back in the day, when I worked for a small ad agency that shared offices with a PR firm. I’d watch them send out a press packages to print media outlets. They included product shots and publishable stories written by the PR reps for their clients.

      I’m not saying that that’s what I’m reading and seeing here, because I don’t know how it works today. But when I see photos provided by a brand along side written copy, I do pause and think “press package.”

      So yes, I’ve read Tony Covey’s comment below stating that this is not a paid advertisement—I’m sure it’s not paid for by Acushnet. But it does feel like PR, and PR is never paid for.

      And for MGS, it is one of those necessary things in trade journals and on trade news sites to fill pages. It’s not unlike the YouTubers TXG, where Ian and Mike travel to TaylorMade and go through the “company spiel” with their spokesman, hit a few balls, and smile, cajole, make a few noncommittal remarks—and then later go back to TXG facilities do their usual testing of the products.

      I assume that MGS will test UG balls as a follow-up to this piece. At least, I’d hope so, since that’s their mission: to replace hype with cold hard data (even though it’s not really a ball targeted to MGS readers)..

      Anyway, these days, stories like these have shelf life don’t really last past a weekend at most, and it’s on to the next big thing. I would be surprised if UG shows up again on this site.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      4 years ago

      It’s an interesting take, I suppose Bob.

      First, we try to avoid stock photography to every extent possible, but sometimes the only option is stock photography or no photography at all. We never want none, and in this case, using the stock stuff made good sense since I think it helped to convey the Union Green vibe. As for the PR aspect of it…I tried to capture the essence of the brand as I understood it. Obviously a radical departure from what we expect from Titleist and from golf brands in general, so I tried to get to the heart of it, while highlighting the challenges that I see in trying to balance UG with its near polar opposite, Titleist.

      And not for anything, I’ve been sitting on this story for nearly 6 months when a source told me about it. Definitely some enthusiasm for the story itself if for no other reason than I had to wait so long to tell it.

      You seem to understand that it wasn’t paid for, and in this case, accusations that it was are particularly comical. UG is a concept, a brand, and a product isn’t intended for the MGS audience. I suppose they might sell a few out of curiosity, but for me, the curiosity is strictly from a business perspective, and it’s certainly going to be interesting to see how it works (or doesn’t).

      I’m not going to commit one way or the other to testing the product. We’ve got some new ball-related stuff in the pipeline and we may include UG in that, but fundamentally these aren’t balls I expect our readers to play. They’re certainly not balls I would recommend from a performance standpoint either. I might buy a mug.

      And yeah, to your last point, it’s probably going to be a while before UG comes up again. I can foresee checking in a year from now to see how it’s going.

      Reply

      Bob

      4 years ago

      I appreciate that, Tony. Thanks for taking the time to write about the process.

      I might suggest that this article fit better under the category of “News” and not “New Releases,” since as you say, few MGS readers would really buy and game it and your perspective has to do with Acushnet’s Titleist/UG dichotomy and how a golf company is positioning itself to attract a niche market.

      And don’t get me wrong, I like reading news about the golf industry itself, since it is a game I don’t enjoy enough.

      MIKE

      4 years ago

      Tony, good reply to a pretty decent post. But please don’t want a second of time testing a (two-piece) ball for “non-golfers”. No ‘golfer’ gives a you-know-what regarding these balls.

      Brian

      4 years ago

      Oh, Acushnet…

      Why would anyone that gives an ounce of thought pay $28 for a dozen no-name surlyn balls? I’ll continue playing Kirkland’s for less than $15 a dozen or, if I want to play a top performing ball, Snell’s for just a bit over $30..

      And those non-golfers that don’t give an ounce of thought into their golf ball are just going to pick up the cheapest thing they can find at their local superstore.

      Reply

      MIKE

      4 years ago

      I’m also thinking that for a bunch of these ‘non-golfers’, after spending $ on clothes (like the ones in the article), they’ll be little left for balls. I can’t imagine any ‘non-golfer’ taking the time to buy a dozen balls online. They’ll just borrow a few from their buds, their dad or the local driving range (“hey, this one is shiny, I’ll pocket it”!)

      Reply

      Scoot24

      4 years ago

      I think Acushnet’s success of the ProV1, because they are willing to pay out more sponsorship money and people are gullible, has gone to their head. Do they think someone who doesn’t care about what ball they use is going to plan ahead enough to order online let alone pay extra money? They can run into Walmart on their way to the course and buy a bag of 48 recycled for $15, 24 new Wilson balls for $10 or box of 45 Nitro balls for $20.

      Reply

      Steven

      4 years ago

      No offense, but you could not be farther off about the sponsorship money.. I’ve been told by multiple sources that Titleist is probably last when it comes to paying tour players.

      Reply

      Scoot24

      4 years ago

      Everything I have read shows they all pay about the same, $50,000 – $100,000 depending on their success, with the difference being that as soon as a player receives their card Acushnet tries to lock them in with a hat, ball, clothing deal. They are marketing geniuses and doing it this way sweetens the pot and locks them in for the ball commercials. Hat and clothes gets the TV exposure on tournament day and then they can exploit the ball use.

      John

      4 years ago

      The bottom line is why buy it? I’m a 10 handicap with any ball I brag out of the bag. I can get Wilson Duo’s for 15 bucks a dozen with no postage. I bought a dozen Nitro Pulsar ( 3 piece ball) for 13 bucks at Walmart and I think they’re great. Is the Pindrop going to play better at 28?

      Reply

      Tigergor

      4 years ago

      Hector, you are missing the point by a mile here. Regardless of who Dean Snell is or not, Snell do not manufacture their own ball. They have ‘manufacturing partners’ (factories in the far East). Dean Snell is a master marketer and guys like you are being sucked in. It’s as simple as this, if you don’t make golf balls in house, you don’t control materials and quality and as a consumer you don’t know what you are getting. Ask Callaway and Taylormade!!! Go and cut a dozen Snell’s open and see what you find. Basically you are paying less and gambling on what you get.

      Reply

      Stephen

      4 years ago

      Umh… looking at golf ball review made back in april wasn’t Snell having problem of quality if I remember correctly… maybe bringing Callaway as an example could not be the best… in term of quality check in the end is always a matter related to how much you want to pay when you work this those external company. If you pay more you can have more control/quality if you pay less they’ll do less control/quality.
      In the end there is the consumer that can choose (fortunately) for sure it was needed in term of market to have something “well enough” at a price point below the usual suspect…

      What I can’t get is when someone try to sell a 3 layer iomer covered ball on same price range of urethane covered ball…

      Reply

      Joe P.

      4 years ago

      Amen! I thought the whole point of selling product DTC was to bypass the marketing hype and offer real value-which companies like Snell and Vice have done.??? I appreciate the marketing efforts that every company puts forth to try to sell their products, but I think I am going to need a pretty big shovel and some high boots to buy this one. Just wait, Callaway will come out with the Travis Mathew ball to compete!

      MIKE

      4 years ago

      I want to introduce my kids to the game of chess. Does Titleist make a chess set w/ rules where any piece can move any way you want it to? You can even hide one in your pocket for the next game. And you can mix the black & white pieces, no need to separate those poor plastic shapes by their color.

      Titleist s/b EMBARRASSED to even consider this…don’t they already have TruSoft & Velocity (lower-priced) balls? I’m sure they make an even cheaper ball. Oh, I get it, those balls are not “cool” enough, or, as they say today, not enough ‘swag’. A few questions for Titleist:

      1) Are these balls ‘sustainable’? I’m really not sure how that word fits in here but it’s used everywhere else so I might as well ask.
      2) Are these balls vegan? Like, if one is disintegrating & an animal came along & for some reason nibbled on it, wouldn’t want to think he’s munching on his/her cousin.
      3) Are these balls environmentally-friendly? Meaning, would a big fish/alligator ‘not’ want to chomp on this ball & go after a Pro V1 instead?
      4) If I play this ball in my club championship, does the “foot wedge” count as a club? Or can I still carry 14 clubs AND the foot wedge?

      Reply

      Dan Corun

      4 years ago

      This is what I love about MGS. No one worries about telling it like they see it. :)

      Reply

      Bobarino

      4 years ago

      Acushnet’s version of the Pontiac Aztec.

      Reply

      Lomez

      4 years ago

      This is for the golfer that likes to turn the Bluetooth speaker up to 11. They need to figure out how to put a Bluetooth speaker right into the ball. “Did you find your ball Dave? No, but I can hear it. I hope I didn’t piss on it.”

      Reply

      Mackie

      4 years ago

      Sooo….this ball basically goes next to the nitros and mojos at walmart. Got it. Dont mind playing behind new golfers that are trying to play decent and have fun. But this just sounds like they’re trying to attract the novice who has no regards for pace of play and doesnt know the meaning of fixing a divot. As long as they play after 4pm, were good.

      Reply

      KevKo

      4 years ago

      Ditto!

      Reply

      MIKE

      4 years ago

      I work. I play after 4PM. I’ll tell them courses other then mine will let them play for free after 4pm just to keep them off of mine.

      Everyone says’, “they want to grow the game”…until those bozos playing this ball (& fitting the description) decide to have a leisurely round of golf in front of your foursome & are too rule-ignorant to let you play thru.

      Reply

      Dodger 57

      4 years ago

      Back in the 1980s Coke on the market just like Titleist Pro V1 owned the market Pepsi got Coke to Blink and they changed a 100 year-old recipe and regret it to this day don’t do it Titleist let’s Calloway and tailor-made have their share don’t change your recipe

      Reply

      J Mytro

      4 years ago

      If you are a casual golfer, your probably not on MGS or another top golf blog….Your watching ESPN to see highlights from the weekends latest golf event. Launching a D2C product is a great plan but I think they are a little too late to the game.

      I am not a fan of the name or branding of the ball/packaging.

      Reply

      rob earl

      4 years ago

      I suspect the description of “non-golfer” really means “casual” or “not so serious, mostly social” blokes who are not into the game the way most of us MGS folks are.

      I get it. We’re part of a shrinking demographic. Muni courses and clubs have seen our numbers decrease. Courses are closing. One of the two munis in my town may close one 9-hole links-style course, the least used, and put in a solar panel array field. Who can blame the industry for trying to attract a few more customers?

      The challenge is to broaden golf’s appeal and Green Union is hoping to reach the kind of people who don’t play all that much, may not have the time for 18 holes. Trouble is this new crowd may also pretty much consider the rules of golf as being optional. I don’t want to cast aspersions on whole groups, but I’ve seen some of these types drinking beer or other alcoholic beverages during their play, something absolutely forbidden in all the tracks I’ve played, and conducting themselves in ways that depart from what we expect to see during a round. No, they’re not your typical MGS follower. I would only hope they acquire some appreciation for the rules and the behavior we consider a part of the game along the way.

      Reply

      rob earl

      4 years ago

      Almost forgot. I don’t see these particular people going the DTC route to get their golf balls. Not very likely.

      Reply

      MIKE

      4 years ago

      Really good post. Golf, like most anything else in life, has rules. Too many in this ‘new crowd’ feel rules are ‘too constricting’ so why bother.

      Reply

      Brandon

      4 years ago

      You have seriously never played golf at a course that has a cart girl going around selling beer and liquor, amongst other things?

      Reply

      scott

      4 years ago

      after chocking down way to much reading of this golf ball review the only words I got to say is. Do you put all of your life savings in this new start up or are you the head of Union Green marketing department ? The people ( golfers ) your talking about don’t buy golf balls they steal from the driving range.

      Reply

      John

      4 years ago

      I can’t figure out why anyone would buy these when snell already makes balls as good as the pro v-1 in this price point.

      Reply

      Art

      4 years ago

      Except the Snell isn’t as good as a Pro V. Or a Bridgestone. Snell is a value ball, and arguably a great value. VALUE. NOT PREMIUM. Take another look at the stats in MGS’s ball test. The “best” Snell ball has THE WORST dispersion numbers of any ball in the test. Worse even than the much discussed and maligned Callaway.

      Reply

      John

      4 years ago

      That’s why the mtb x is often referred to as the better pro v1 I suppose.

      VanTrago

      4 years ago

      Art makes a really good point. When you play a ball with large dispersion, you never know whether that last shot was you or the ball. So, besides adding strokes and frustration to your game, it limits your ability to improve. Low dispersion is probably the most important characteristic that a ball can have.

      Quality is not something you can inspect into a ball, or solve by putting a dot at the best place to strike an imbalanced one — you have to build an intrinsically better ball..

      I can’t help but think Snell and Callaway are both working furiously to improve the quality of their respective balls. But if they do find and implement ways to reduce dispersion, they still have to convince the market that their products have really improved..

      That may not be so difficult for Snell since their only product is balls. Especially if MyGolfSpy’s next grand ball test shows marked improvement in Snell’s dispersion.

      For Callaway, that will be more difficult. Remember the Callaway µPro GPS with “No Annual Fees”? When Callaway suddenly dropped course update support for it, they left thousands of us with useless µPros. Add their ball eccentricity problem to that, and the message is clear.: the Callaway brand is not trustworthy.. Once painted with that brush, a company’s climb back to respectability is long and hard.

      Mark

      4 years ago

      Really? Shades of Snell, etc. Just what we need – we are working hard to get young people (First Tee) to appreciate the game and play by the rules, and Acushnet wants to start a “new” approach to the game. No rules, ultra slow play while people goof off, etc. What’s the matter Acushnet – losing market share to balls half the cost of Titleist? Here’s a better idea – make balls cheaper for young people learning the game. What’s to lose?

      Reply

      Rod_CCCGOLFUSA

      4 years ago

      Tony, I rely on you to sort marketing from reality. The only numbers in this report were price points. I just got back from the PGA Show, completely over served with “awesome” distance and “record breaking” technology —- and no data. When I asked for data, I got marketing brochures. Is golf just going to smoke & mirrors, or what?

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      4 years ago

      Based on what we learned during the ball testing, we’ve been working to bring some meaningful numbers to the golf ball space. I hope to be up and running with that soon.

      I’m not sure how applicable that will be to Union Green. It’s not a ball that’s for the typical MGS reader. If you’re serious about performance, that’s where Titleist comes in. If you’re looking for more of a casual vibe…a lifestyle thing (which again, isn’t the typical MGS reader) than Union Green might fit.

      For me, this one is intriguing not because of the product, but because of the business angle.

      Reply

      DaveD

      4 years ago

      I know a non-golfer golfer who, without a word of a lie, swipes range balls and has old Alien clubs he got from a guy who was throwing them out. These balls are too expensive for him.

      Reply

      Tess

      4 years ago

      I cringed while reading most of the article, thinking about playing behind a group (or groups) of the new “culture” of golfers playing by their own “rules”.
      I have no problem playing behind new golfers because I remember my early days . But, I can’t stand playing behind a group that doesn’t care about the rules, etiquette or the groups behind them. This new “culture” on our fairways is giving me a headache already.

      Reply

      Matt B

      4 years ago

      Something tells me that the buyers of a “cool and casual vibe” golf ball don’t read this blog. Me, I’m much more into on the edge and stressed kind of ball. No wait! I play Snells because of this blog! I feel cool and casual coming on. Maybe. Probably not…..

      Reply

      KM

      4 years ago

      I used TopFlite XL X OUTS LOVE EM!

      Reply

      Bobbers

      4 years ago

      As soon as I saw the 40 dollar short sleeve T-shirt and the 55 dollar long sleeve model I knew exactly what was up. Not interested at all. And I WOULD have potentially been part of the target market. I’m guessing they had to sit around and guess how to sound/look down-to-earth…and they didn’t get it right.

      Reply

      Max Parris

      4 years ago

      Now now guys. Ease off just a little. I think the dimples are so cute.

      Reply

      Ken

      4 years ago

      MGS – show us the data. That’s why we’re all here. Nice story, but weren’t you just bashing Golf Digest in your article two days ago for the same marketing hype and lack of facts you published here? I’d much rather see: “Here’s the first part of the story. Check back next week when we provide testing data against our recent golf ball test to see how these stack up.”

      Reply

      Osc

      4 years ago

      Yup…that’s why I also signed up and contributed…

      Reply

      Daniel Green

      4 years ago

      Isn’t the whole point of a brand like this that data is of absolutely no value to the target consumer?

      This ball isn’t for MGS readers. This balls for people who just want to play golf and don’t really GAF.

      Modern entry level consumers in every market buy based on brand, message and convenience.

      Get a grip lads. The rule abiding, country club loving, dues paying, foot joy wearing consumer is quite literally dying, and a brand like this is 100% what is necessary for golf to attract new audiences.

      Reply

      Ken

      4 years ago

      That’s pretty elitist. If that’s the case, why did they even write up a review of these or include non-premium golf balls in their test?

      LK

      4 years ago

      Nice try Acushnet, stick with your elitist mentality. Oh wait, $80 sweatshirts for the non-golfer.

      Reply

      JoeinFL

      4 years ago

      IMO, the non golfer will buy the cheapest balls they can find. I can’t see them spending $20-$30 on balls.
      When I started playing 14 years ago, I would buy Wilson titanium balls or similar for $6 a dozen. As I improved and lost fewer, I moved to better balls and now play Pro v1’s. I’m a 14 handicap and it took a long time to spend $4 a ball.
      And as far as the “Union Green” name. For the non golfer, how will they even know anything about them?
      Just my thoughts!

      Reply

      Eric

      4 years ago

      Is this a paid promotion? Getting hard to tell on here now

      Reply

      Pete

      4 years ago

      Agreed. Much like the recent Tommy Armour article/advert. Starting to appear more transparent.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      4 years ago

      Guys – advertising policy is all right here. You can speculate, or you can read.

      http://mygolfspy.com/advertise/

      Titleist is not an advertiser. Dick’s Sporting Goods is, and while I suppose you can read something into us telling you about a brand making quality golf equipment at an affordable price (they use the same factory as Tour Edge for their clubs and the same factory as Vice and others for their golf balls), but advertiser or not, we always tell the story on our terms. I’d suggest it’s actually more telling that there’s a brand making – in some cases – gear that’s on par to that of the big OEMs for significantly less money, and no other media outlet is really talking about it. Wonder why that is?

      Robert Wilks

      4 years ago

      It’s fascinating and curious to see Acushnet embarking on its Union Green venture. I’ll be especially interested to see how Union Green balls stack up against Pro V1’s in your next grand ball test.

      Tony, for the rest of us, please add Noodle “Long and Soft” and Chromax “Distance” to your next test list, too! We’d like to see actual data that shows how much differently the balls we’ve been playing perform from the ones that the pros play. (Actually, not many of us are playing Chromax yet, but they are a lot easier to track through the air, so we might want to switch brands if they test as well.)

      Oh! I almost forgot. Please also test the Srixon “AD333” or the Srixon “Q Star” or the Srixon “Distance”? According to the, “USGA’s List of Confirming Golf Balls,” those balls share the same “M-H” Spin Rating with the “Pro V1” and “Pro V1x”, . But they are only 2-piece balls!

      Reply

      Tim

      4 years ago

      This makes absolutely no sense what so ever. How do you appeal to the “Non-Golfer” market? They don’t golf. Maybe Spaulding will come out with a Basketball for the Non Hoopster….. Non golfers who don’t usually golf usually only golf in the once a year charity captain and crew and they can usually find about a dozen balls during that round and will use them the next year. Additionally the price point makes no sense at all. They already have balls in that price point. And to order them direct??? come on, is this April 1st??

      Reply

      Deadeye

      4 years ago

      It would seem that the non golfer they are targeting already plays “whatever balls I find”. I can’t see that player rushing out to buy a $20 or $28 dollar box of balls no matter who makes them. There’s better deals already out there including found balls.

      Reply

      Doc

      4 years ago

      Not to mention all those range balls we find in the tall grass..

      Reply

      CK

      4 years ago

      Name is far too political sounding for me. Long Live Snell!

      Reply

      Bob

      4 years ago

      Cheaper golf balls … but $80 branded sweatshirts?

      So this is market to the guy who says, “I wanna play golf, but I don’t wanna look like I shopped at Target for cheap Warbirds and off-brand tee-shirts. So I’ll buy the coolly packaged Teebirds and the $55 cotton/poly long sleeve, please. Union Green rules!”

      The site’s picture gallery offers a bit of a contradiction, relaxed non golfers carrying with half a set of clubs in Sunday bags—on grandly coastal, well-maintained golf course. Not your local public course, it seems.

      I mean, I get it. Their trying to paint a picture for millennials and gen Zs. All that’s missing is their hipster lifestyle Instagram account … Whoops. Spoke too soon.

      Reply

      Adam

      4 years ago

      Not sure about anyone else, but I have been golfing for 30 years in the PNW which has the most annoyingly liberal/millennial mentality in the world and I yet to find a golf course that lets you take your dog with you, let alone not on a leash to the golf course??? Where did these marketing guys come up with this crap. Were they even employees of Titleist let alone golfers! Next thing they will advertise golfers with dreadlocks, wearing hemp logo baring apparel and packing tents around on their backs as they try to become one with the golf course. Millennials are the same group of people that think golf courses are environmentally harmful and are not “green”, and most of them hate the stereotypical pretentious attitudes that are sometimes found in golf. And a Union Green wants to sell a $80 sweatshirt to them. WTF…..

      Reply

      MIKE

      4 years ago

      Uh-Oh. If I buy & play these balls, I guess my days of drinking a ‘big-company’ domestic beer are long gone. Can someone please provide the proper craft beer match?

      Reply

      DR

      4 years ago

      Nope. No way.

      Reply

      DR

      4 years ago

      I just wish they’d come out with “sage and verbena infused ” to complete the descent into capturing the hipster market. That would really lower the stress levels on the course. What’s next?!! Hitting it straight, having to honestly count each shot and record a score!!!!

      Reply

      Dave

      4 years ago

      I’m having trouble understanding the idea that these are golf balls targeted at non-golfers. A golfer who doesn’t play much golf isn’t going to need to buy many golf balls. There may well be more competition in the lower price market than the premium market including lower price models from Titleist. I don’t pretend to be the sharpest knife in the drawer, but I don’t get it.

      Reply

      Lenny

      4 years ago

      When I can buy 12 dozen for 36.00 of once hit and lost golf balls. Why would I pay the prices you have mentioned

      Reply

      Milo

      4 years ago

      Definitely not the brightest idea ever.

      Reply

      Milo

      4 years ago

      This is the dumbest idea ever

      Reply

      Mike Reed

      4 years ago

      Acushnet also needs to launch a club brand to go with the balls. Perhaps shorter sets with fewer clubs to appeal to the “non-golfer” who would buy these balls. Titleist is way too old school for many younger players and could use another brand for them. Just a thought!!

      Reply

      Bulldog

      4 years ago

      A lifestyle golf ball for non-golfers? A brand for those who aren’t brand loyal? If this works then it will confirm that I’m totally disconnected for current culture.

      Reply

      Stefano

      4 years ago

      What I don’t get is why should someone pay $27.99 for a 3 piece iomer cover when with $32.99 you can buy snell, that become $28.99/dz for the 5 dz value pack…. there is a market for 3 piece iomer ?

      Reply

      Larry Proffer

      4 years ago

      If I want to play a ‘decent’ three piece ball I’ll buy the Vice Tour. Good distance and good spin (for an ionomer covered ball). for $15.99 a dozen instead of $27.99.

      Reply

      Stefano

      4 years ago

      I agree, for a 3 piece iomer is far too expensive…

      VanTrago

      4 years ago

      Larry, I don’t question that Vice Tour is the best ball for you. But you might find it interesting that the, “R&A/USGA List of Conforming Golf Balls,” lists the Vice Tour’s Spin Rating as “L-M,” (low off the driver and medium off a short iron). By comparison, the Pro V1 and most other balls played on the Pro Tour are rated “M-H.”

      I wonder just how important it is that touring pros play an “M-H” ball. Is it possible that marketing hype is the primary reason why most pros prefer “M-H” over some other rating? Maybe its all a matter of what you get used to.

      The golf ball industry has a vested interest in maintaining our belief that “M-H” balls are better — they can sell them for a lot more money. It’s their golden goose..

      Actually, among the 3- and 4-pieces balls on the conforming list (ie., among the expensive), I notice a great many that are rated “L-H” and many more that are rated “L-M.” Turns out there are many inexpensive balls that also share the “L-M” rating (though none are rate “x-H”

      What if it really doesn’t make any difference in your game, so long as you consistently play the same ball? Or, heaven forbide, what if the correlation between spin rating and score is just the opposite of what we’ve been encouraged to believe? Dead goose?

      How could you objectively and quantitatively determine how Spin Rating does correlate with Pro Tour scores? Therein lies a great challenge for the test team at MyGolfSpy!

      [MyGolfSpy, I do have some ideas on how to design a test for this, if you are interested.]

      Hector

      4 years ago

      Once again, I think we all ought to send Dean Snell a thank you note. Titleist has recognized that we hackers don’t need or want to spend $50/dozen for golf balls, and that Snell’s DTC marketing is ensuring we have options. Rather than cutting the price of their premium products, they have opted to go after what they view as the “other” market. Well, that’s fine. They will no doubt erode the market for those in that space. But doing sot won’t protect the company from a loss of customers who want a tour quality golf ball (i.e., urethane cover) that isn’t priced to cover the tour player endorsement costs that Pro V1s and Pro V1Xs incur.
      I can’t figure out why they think I (or anyone else) would pay the same price per dozen for Pindrops as I pay for Snell’s balls. FWIW, I have been playing Snell’s on a burnt out, hard surface course here in New Zealand for a month and have yet to retire a ball for damage to the cover. A couple have a half dozen or more rounds on them. They last and last and last.

      Reply

      Vin Smith

      4 years ago

      Where are you getting your Snell balls from in NZ? Only seen a couple in pro shops at normal retail price. No DTC value.. Get my Bridgestone balls from golfbox.au on special but would love to try Snell. Cheers.

      Reply

      Hector

      4 years ago

      Hi Vin. I brought them with me in my baggage. They don’t take much room. I do it every year, but the difference this year is that I brought Snell golf balls rather than Kirklands. On another subject, if anyone you know wants to buy a full bag of clubs (less putter) for a reasonable price, I have a set of Cleveland HB3s with a Ping G10 driver and 3 metal here in Taupo that I have replaced with Hogan Ft. Worth Blacks and Callaway X3Hot that I brought along with the Snell balls. I’m going to put them on TradeMe shortly unless someone here in Taupo wants them.

      Tigergor

      4 years ago

      Sigh. If only you had a clue what you were talking about.

      We get it. You’re tight! That’s cool. But it’s not Titleist’s fault you’re tight. You can continue to satisfy yourself that your unwillingness to pay for a undoubtedly better product is justified and won’t impact your game. You’re wrong, but you are entitled to be wrong.

      Union Green doesn’t appeal to me. Im cool with pro v X. But as a product that is at a ‘lower price point’ (another way of saying inferior product), I would certainly consider Union Green, a ball manufactured by the company that markets it and with undoubtably higher quality control than cheap Asian rebrands like Snell, Kirkland and Vice that have zero control over end product.

      You guys crack me up. You would rather play a lottery ball than a quality product. Same with the chrome soft crowd. Not only has soft compression been shown to be a myth if distance is of value to you (and it should be!), but the quality control is laughable. Often in a dozen of chrome soft you find completely different internal layer make ups. Rediculous.

      Reply

      Hammer

      4 years ago

      *Ridiculous

      Hector

      4 years ago

      Hi TigerGor; You might want to educate yourself about who Dean Snell is, what he has done in the industry, and how he is doing it. HE DEISGNED THE PRO V1 AND PRO V1X WHEN HE WAS AT TITLEIST AND THE TP5 WHEN HE WAS AT TAYLORMADE. Listen to interviews with him that are accessible on YouTube. His commitment to production quality control is second to none.

      Tigergor

      4 years ago

      Hector, you are missing the point by a mile here. Regardless of who Dean Snell is or not, Snell do not manufacture their own ball. They have ‘manufacturing partners’ (factories in the far East). Dean Snell is a master marketer and guys like you are being sucked in. It’s as simple as this, if you don’t make golf balls in house, you don’t control materials and quality and as a consumer you don’t know what you are getting. Ask Callaway and Taylormade!!! Go and cut a dozen Snell’s open and see what you find. Basically you are paying less and gambling on what you get.

      Adam

      4 years ago

      Holy cow, this is ridiculous. It’s a golf ball, not some hipster fashion accessory.
      You’re selling a golf ball not designer jeans

      Reply

      Ralph Finaldi

      4 years ago

      Being a brand strategist and all around golf freak, I can see the identity attractive to the ‘demographic’ you’ve described here. Titleist may be too mainstream in the mind of the consumer. But with a fresh new identity with an alternative look that swims upstream may be appealing to many people who feel golf is too stodgy. Additionally, the Titleist strategy may simply use their really good ionomer technology, change the brand ID and see if the brand can sell more golf balls and serve an audience who would steer clear of the Titelist brand for a variety of notions (price, too mainstream, etc.) and take them for a spin. Although I wouldn’t play an ionomer cover golf ball, others may not care or even know the difference. And there’s plenty of golfers in that category with $30 in their pocket to spend on a dozen. So with a parent company directly associated with quality and engineering, they have a good test here. I think this is a very smart move. IMHO.

      Reply

      Berniez40

      4 years ago

      Agreed. During The Great Recession is was smart to spin off Cobra and cut the number of Pinnacle balls. In the newer economy, where cash is a little more abundant, it makes sense to experiment with things of this nature, and see if the market really is headed into a new direction.

      Reply

      RT

      4 years ago

      The Gamer is a good enough ball and the price is very good at Dick’s .!!!
      It plays very well for the price it’s very hard to beat.I hope this will cause the price of balls to get where they are more affordable for the regular player ..
      It must be getting into Titleist pockets as well as others for this to enter the market.Now just bring down the price of the clubs . Used equipment is getting out of price because of the rise in price in new clubs.. The regular Joe can’t keep up with the cost of golf much longer..Green Fees also need to drop down so more can afford to play which helps everyone !!

      Reply

      Kevin

      4 years ago

      I know I’m not their target customer, but I’m just not seeing the appeal of this brand at all. I get “lifestyle” golf clothing like Travis Mathew and I even prefer some of that, but a “lifestyle” ball? I think they would have been better off with a Direct to Consumer ball. Will these balls be on closeout in TJ Maxx or Job Lots stores next year?

      Reply

      Regis

      4 years ago

      Wish them well. Just not sure where the market is. There are so many good golf balls out there if you want to shop deals and buy in bulk. You can get
      3 piece urethane balls on sale for less than $20 a dozen especially this time of year. Plus their target market includes a lot of players who will play anything (within reason) and are seasoned ball hawkers.

      Reply

      Karl

      4 years ago

      So, to make a parallel to another industry Union Green is to Titleist as Swatch is to Omega. Same mega parent brand, completely different vibe and audience. Looking to take some market share from Vice, Cut, et al. Will be interesting to see who they choose to be “brand influencers” if any.

      Reply

      Alec

      4 years ago

      Do you plan to try this out in the most wanted test against other 2/3-piece ionomer balls? Seems like it would be decent for slower swing speed players. And would be interesting to see comparisons to other <$30 and <$20 golf balls. While most people who would buy this ball wouldn't read a Most Wanted test, it would still be great to see how the performance per dollar test works out. Good stuff Tony.

      Reply

      dave

      4 years ago

      How many consultants were needed determine this was “smart?” I have got to meet the person buying their branded merch; something tells me demand will be sluggish.

      Reply

      Tank

      4 years ago

      Being part of the family, I’m sure that they will have some success. Interesting looking dimple pattern just might make me try some.

      Reply

      Mike Lambert

      4 years ago

      So this ball will feature such attributes as being able to travel further when kicked, beeping loudly when surrounded by tall grass, hearing and adjusting its direction when shouted at and adding a lime flavor when dunked in a beer? I’m in!!

      Reply

      Adam

      4 years ago

      Uhhhhh….. are we kidding here. I am going to find it very hard to believe that a golf ball will define a lifestyle and at that price point….. For $20 bucks I will go buy a box of Noodles or $28 I can get Bridgestone E6 or E12. And if Titleist is making the ball, why pull sales from their lower end balls like the Velocity. A new dimple pattern and a logo aren’t going to be enough for me to spend the money on a brand whereas I can get tried and true products for the same price. IMO they missed the mark at that price point. Realistically it’s still a $30 ball without a urethane cover??? Bring the “Pindrop” out with a urethane cover at $25 or below then you have something unique that could create a following.

      Reply

      Marty

      4 years ago

      Don’t get it. You can but a 15 pack of Pinnacles in our shop for the same price as Union Green’s dozen and you can bet those Pinnacles will go forever. As for the Pindrop (terrible name, IMO) , they MIGHT have something there but there are similar Srixon, Taylor Made, and Callaway balls that are very close in price. Seems to me all they are really selling is an image. Not too sure that’s a smart business plan.

      Reply

      Rattana

      4 years ago

      Yeah–80 dollar sweatshirts probably aren’t going to sell well with the intended target audience…..

      Reply

      Greg

      4 years ago

      Hmm! Fun non competitive enjoy the banter. Sounds like a non conforming ball to me. Now we will really see how far a ball will go..
      Looks like Two complete markets coming.
      Thise that play by the rules and thise who make their own.
      That will be a huge market because all people want to do is hit it furthur.
      You cant supress egos.

      Reply

      Darren

      4 years ago

      Haha my thoughts exactly…

      Reply

      Pje

      4 years ago

      Titleist/Acushnet:
      Umm, let’s make some cheap golf balls and market them as hipster cool.
      Nothing to see here.

      Reply

      Willie T

      4 years ago

      This ball will appeal to the casual golfer – such as myself. One thing is for sure, its logo will be easily to discern your ball among the sea of Titleist ProV1’s, Callaways and TayloMades. I suspect I will try them for the sake of seeing just how well they do play.
      Image wise – the promo lingo reminds me of my sons and the clothing choices they were making in the early 2000’s . The artwork/logo design all look strangely similar to clothing lines of that time (hint: American Eagle…)

      Reply

      Rob W.

      4 years ago

      The golfer they target buys his balls at Target.
      He slices his 1st drive into the woods, goes to look for his ball, comes out with 3-6 found balls and plays the rest of the round with them (until he has to hit over water).

      Reply

      Jeremy

      4 years ago

      Targeting a non-golfer with a serious ad and storyline? Do they think a non-golfer is going to read the box and compare the Union Green and Top Flight /MaxFli/etc balls for ‘performance details’ or storylines?

      Honestly, why would someone choose this, and not a Wilson Chaos instead? If I didn’t know any better, I’d go with flashy and catchy above all else.

      Reply

      Nick

      4 years ago

      Like the idea, but don’t understand the price points. At $28 for the 3 piece ionomer, its almost surely outpaced by the Project (a).. and the Project (a) is only a dollar or two more. Then the 2 piece is 19.99? The Diablo Tour, Top Flite Gamer & K-Sig will also surely be better balls. I think the intended market is a neat idea, I just don’t see how their prices are going to make them competitive when there are other balls out there for similar money that are balls FOR “golfers” that have characteristics that Union Green says they are not going to advertise/market their own balls with. Now if the 3-piece was 19.99 and the 2 piece was 9.99, I think they would be much, much more viable.

      Reply

      Phil

      4 years ago

      This won’t go anywhere. There are already online brands at half the cost. Casual social golfers borrow equipment from friends for an occasional round. They won’t be influenced by the marketing.

      Reply

      Gerald Teigrob

      4 years ago

      I will continue to play my Srixons and Titleists. Apparently this ball isn’t fir me. Good luck Acushnet. I aspire to be competitive as a golfer so I will stick with brands I am comfortable playing. It seems like a case of who they aren’t appealing to than who they are. And I agree with you, Bobby!

      Reply

      Dave

      4 years ago

      Hardest part with this strategy will be to engage the “non-golfer” enough to the point where they actually go online to order golf balls. That could prove to be a big ask for the demographic they are seeking to capture.

      My buddies who show up to the first tee with a cooler and speaker blasting typically buy whatever the cheapest ball in the pro shop is because they decided they wanted to play golf that morning.

      Reply

      B81smith

      4 years ago

      Dead in the water. This shouldn’t work out but maybe who knows. It is Titleist after all.

      Reply

      Berniez40

      4 years ago

      Interesting prospect, and a wise move by Acushnet. I am glad Acushnet is realizing that under the old “Fortune Brands” Umbrella, Acushnet was already participating in this market on a rather large scale through their Cobra and Pinnacle brands. I remember when The Cobra Long Drive Team dominated The Long Drive circuit and Pinnacle Golds were the official ball. Weekend warriors who just wanted fun looked more to those guys as models than they did the tour pros. Perhaps this is a chance to take back the rather large piece of that market they once owned. As they have spun off Cobra, and shrunk Pinnacle, this seems to be the best direction for such a strategy.

      Reply

      Bobby

      4 years ago

      We’re talking about a golf ball aren’t we ? Appears to be taking itself a little too serious. It’s audience could care lees if it plays range balls.

      Reply

      chris

      4 years ago

      So they want to sell a ball to compete with the top flites of the world without having all of the strict quality controls and they don’t want to soil their name…..sound about right?

      Reply

      Walter

      4 years ago

      Good plan………….

      Jeff

      4 years ago

      How will they plan to market this group of non golfers? Not that it’s for me….but could be. Hmm, maybe there isn’t much difference at this price point to even test??

      Reply

      Adam

      4 years ago

      This article reads like an instagram “influencer” turned into a golf ball

      Reply

      Marty

      4 years ago

      Adam – I was thinking exactly the same thing. I was also thinking that the logo on that ball is way-way-way too big considering how ugly and incongruous it is, however it does look fine on the coffee cup and especially on the sweatshirt and that’s because the brand-name sounds like a house-brand for a line of sweatshirts and warmups that one might find at the GAP or some other big box store.

      Adam

      4 years ago

      I am also an avid hunter and I can buy into the “lifestyle” pitch. I wear hunting clothes from Kuiu that are lifestyle oriented. Clothes that can be worn daily or when you’re in the woods. But in order to sell the “lifestyle” there is usually a passion on the consumer side for that hobby. They are trying to appeal to people that aren’t really avid golfers so they don’t have the same passion. They are not the ones you see on the course wearing all Adidas or Puma gear. And I guarantee most of them will not spend $75 on polo, they would just as soon buy a $20 polo from Old Navy if the course requires collars, but if I were a betting man I would venture to say that they probably don’t play at courses with required dress codes. And what… carrying a Union Green golf ball around in their pocket is going to translate to some lifestyle that most could care less which ball or clubs they use and they are just at the course to have fun. Totally misdirected on Titleist part in my opinion. They would have been better off bringing in extremely affordable golf apparel then the balls later down the road to see if they could establish a following first with “lifestyle” oriented products.

      Reply

      Ian Jackson

      4 years ago

      CUT IT!

      Reply

      Jon

      4 years ago

      When will this golf ball be tested and compared to others in its price point and product category? Is this going after the Snell & Vice market?

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    May 5, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Fujikura Ventus Driver Shafts
    Golf Balls
    May 5, 2024
    Ball Lab: 2024 Titleist AVX
    News
    May 4, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Takomo Long Game Golf Clubs