Snell Golf Launches Prime 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 golf balls
Golf Balls

Snell Golf Launches Prime 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 golf balls

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Snell Golf Launches Prime 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 golf balls

Snell Golf is launching three new balls. Two will be familiar while the third is a compelling offering that will allow Snell to reach a larger and, perhaps, unique audience. 

It could be said the theme of the new Snell lineup is “simplicity.” That starts with the names—Prime 2.0, Prime 3.0, Prime 4.0. The numerical bits refer to the number of layers. 

We’ll dig into more details but the idea is to keep fitting simple as well. Snell will recommend a model based on how far you hit your 7-iron. It’s an approach that speaks to the reality that golfers don’t always know how far they hit their drives and, even when they think they do, the numbers tend to be inflated.  

As a target club, golfers tend to have a more realistic sense of how far they hit their 7-iron.

A Snell Prime Golf ball

A Fresh Start 

It’s unusual for a direct-to-consumer brand like Snell (or any ball brand, for that matter) to replace an entire lineup just one year into a product cycle but there were some issues with the prior generation—most notably with the MTB Prime X. So Snell founder Dean Snell took the unusual step of pressing the reset button well ahead of schedule. 

“It was tough because they [customers] were waiting for things to come and to me that the Prime X was a disappointment last year for them, which bothered me,” says Snell. 

“I wasn’t happy about it but I stayed in touch through email and just was honest with them, saying, ‘I agree with you and I’m gonna fix it and we’re not gonna make it anymore’. So you’re right and we’re wrong and it’s time to move on. So that’s what we did.” 

Snell Prime 2.0 , 3.0, and 4.0 golf balls

Starting over with a new factory is no simple task to begin with but Snell’s issues were further complicated as the company was ready to start production on the Prime 4.0. Its factory of choice, Launch Technologies in Taiwan, burned to the ground before the first balls could roll off the line. 

Yet again, Snell was forced to pivot and set up tooling in a different factory. It’s the reason the new Prime balls are launching now instead of in January as intended. 

What’s New and Improved 

The core of a Snell Prime 4.0 golf ball
The core of a Snell Prime 4.0 golf ball

The new Snell Prime balls feature a series of significant improvements over the previous Prime series. 

First, Snell tweaked the core chemistry to add a bit more speed without making the ball firmer. 

Most notably, Snell tackled durability and, more generally, the cover issues with the prior generation. He ditched the factory that made the balls and switched to a new XV3 urethane formulation for the covers.  

To ensure the durability issues were resolved, Snell leveraged his customer base. A healthy percentage of the prototype testing was by those same customers who experienced issues with the prior generation. 

Based on internal testing and the feedback from those golfers, Snell is confident the durability issues have been put to rest. 

As a small aside in all of this, those same testers have told Snell that the new cover performs better in the wind. 

Also resolved are the issues with the paint system. Snell’s previous factory used an anti-staining agent to help prevent grass stains. The tradeoff was that it made the balls hard to mark with a Sharpie and impossible to print custom logos on. 

A final note on the paint story: Snell has tweaked the pigmentation of the new models. Golfer preference is always a bit of a moving target but some of the feedback on the previous MTB Prime models was that they looked “old” next to other models. 

The New Snell Prime Series 

Snell Prime 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 golf balls

The 3.0 and 4.0 are more or less what you’d expect from balls in the “Tour” category. Snell says the 3.0 is a mid-80s compression offering while the 4.0 is just slightly firmer, landing in the high 80s. 

Greenside and short-game spin are similar for both models and, as is standard these days, both are designed to keep spin in check off the driver and long irons. 

It’s perhaps a simplification but with the additional layer and slightly higher compression of the Prime 4.0, it should prove more suitable for higher swing speed players (golfers who hit their 7-irons farther than 160 yards). The 3.0 should work well for a wide range of golfers from low-mid to mid-high swingers who won’t over-compress the ball but also don’t stand to gain much of a performance benefit from the extra layer. 

Snell Prime 2.0 

The core of a Snell Prime 2.0 golf ball
The core of a Snell Prime 2.0 golf ball

Arguably, the most significant piece of the new Snell golf ball story is the Prime 2.0 which, as the numbering system suggests, is a two-piece ball. The unexpected ripple in our story is that one of those pieces is a urethane cover. 

A rarity in the marketplace, Snell says the two-piece urethane offering is the ball he’s wanted to make for years but it wasn’t possible previously, at least not if you wanted the ball to perform.  

Historically, the tradeoff for higher greenside spin was invariably higher spin off the driver so you’d end up with a ball that was very slow and very short. 

Who wants that?  

Anybody? 

A closeup of a Snell Prime 2.0 golf ball

Advances in core and cover technology have made Snell’s Prime 2.0 a viable, if not surprisingly compelling,  offering for slow swingers. 

And, yeah, this is coming from a guy who habitually rails against two-piece golf balls. 

To be clear, coming in at roughly 80 compression, the Snell Prime 2.0 shouldn’t be considered low compression, especially not alongside balls like Supersoft and DUO Soft. That said, with the urethane cover, it’s going to feel significantly softer than its compression number suggests and, more importantly, it’s going to provide a level of short-game and greenside performance that’s all but unheard of in the two-piece category. 

That said, the Prime 2.0 won’t work for everyone. 

“If a player that hits the ball 180 miles an hour tries to play the 2.0. he’ll lose ball speed, so it’s not for him,” says Snell. “The player that hits the ball 180 yards with a drive is not gaining anything with 4.0 so it’s on both sides of the spectrum.  

“You really want to play and pay for what you’re gonna have value from. Don’t judge something by how many layers it has. Judge something by how you play and what those layers can do for you.” 

Snell’s thinking is that if you’re only hitting drives 180 yards, you probably shouldn’t focus on hitting it 182. It’s more important to put your efforts into what’s going help you finish the hole in fewer strokes. 

To do that might require you to think differently about what matters in a golf ball. 

A Snell Prime 2.0 golf ball

“Consumers believe that the soft two-piece golf balls is what they need to compress the ball and that message, somehow down the road, really needs to be taken out of their minds, “ says Snell. “The four you made on that hole wasn’t because you compressed your driver a little bit more and you added .1 ball speed. It’s because you had the ball spin a little bit more and it stopped a little closer and you two-putted.” 

Notably, Snell has been a long-time advocate for the idea that the lowest swing speed players benefit more from Tour balls than Tour players do but he also understands there’s a cost element involved and not everyone is willing to pay $55 for a dozen balls. 

With the Prime 2.0, the idea is to take the cost out of the equation and give golfers something that can help them. “To me,” says Snell, “that is more important than just trying to push soft and low compression down their throat.” 

While he takes full responsibility for the issues with the previous model, Dean Snell believes the problems are in the past. He’s happy with the new lineup and believes his loyal customer base will be, too. 

The core of a Snell Prime 3.0 golf ball.
The core of a Snell Prime 3.0 golf ball

Snell Prime Golf Balls – Pricing and Availability 

To help those customers find the right Snell Prime model, Snell is offering a standard Test Pack (Prime 2.0, Prime 3.0, Prime 4.0 and Get Sum) as well as Tour Test Pack which contains two sleeves each of Prime 3.0 and Prime 4.0. 

The price of the Snell Prime 2.0 is $24.99. The Prime 3.0 is $32.99 and the Prime 4.0 is $34.99. 

The Prime 2.0 and 3.0 are shipping now in white and yellow. 

The Prime 4.0 is tentatively scheduled to ship May 1, though it could be a bit longer. They’ll ship as soon as they come off the boat. The yellow version is expected to ship around June 1.

For more information, visit Snellgolf.com.

For You

For You

First Look
May 14, 2024
Stewart Adds Carbon to the Q Follow Range of Pushcarts
Wilson Staff Model golf balls. Wilson Staff Model golf balls.
Golf Balls
May 14, 2024
Wilson Staff Model Golf Balls: A MyGolfSpy “Just So” Story
First Look
May 14, 2024
FootJoy Mints Special Todd Snyder Premiere Series Shoes
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Donn

      22 mins ago

      If Tutelman is in, so am I. Eventually. I’m stuffed with balls since I live a few miles away from Carlsbad. But I will probably invest in a box of 2.0 if they come in a bright color. More good work by Tony.

      Reply

      Chris Cooper

      2 weeks ago

      Played the Prime 3.0 yesterday and was well impressed. Great feel and very happy with the performance. Delighted Snell are back on track. Like other commentators I played the original Snell MTBs as first choice, but did not like the replacements. Dean Snell knows how do design a golf ball and most importantly knows what his customers want.

      Reply

      Jeffrey Trick

      2 weeks ago

      When ca we expect these golf balls in Canada?

      Reply

      Max

      2 weeks ago

      I purchased a dozen MTB PRO based on your reports it is like hitting a rock Snell nope never again

      Reply

      Ian

      2 weeks ago

      There is no model of Snell golf ball named “MTB-PRO”

      Reply

      P.J.

      2 weeks ago

      Seeing all the chatter above, shows how interested MyGolfSpy viewers are in the Snell balls! I was a Snell “My Tour Ball” guy from day one. Unfortunately, the Prime balls didn’t perform well and they lost me as a customer. I knew Dean Snell was retooling and starting over and I’ve been patiently waiting. Can’t wait to try out the new balls, but to be honest – I’m really waiting on the MGS Ball Lab and Ball Tests reports.
      I’m pulling for Snell – they were my ‘go to’ ball when it was MTB’s, hoping they’re back!!

      Reply

      Jake

      2 weeks ago

      Tony, we look forward to your ball lab results

      Reply

      Andrew

      2 weeks ago

      Can’t wait for them to make their way to Australia. The last model wasn’t right you could tell, if you used the model before the Prime and prime X

      Reply

      Al Graceffa

      2 weeks ago

      Looks like an exciting line of golf balls . Take my advice , offer large discounts on a mixed pack . To get people to try out your balls ,you almost have to give them a deal they can’t refuse . It’s word of mouth here at Hilton Head . I’ll bet 40 percent of the golfers at my course use a Vice ball . Many 10 and under handicaps and even though many are well healed they still started with the 5 pack deal.

      Reply

      John O

      2 weeks ago

      The urathane outer layer looks thicker to me on these than other models (both cast and TPU) and thicker than previous Snell balls. Looks like about 1.5 times thicker.

      Reply

      Micah McGaha

      2 weeks ago

      It’s the same as the MTB Prime from last year. They’re not able to utilize cast urethane due to their new manufacturing partners so the cover is thicker.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      2 weeks ago

      It is not the same ball.

      Micah M

      2 weeks ago

      I meant the same thickness as the MTB Prime, Tony.

      John O

      2 weeks ago

      The new cover is also thicker than other TPU covers from other manufacturers.

      Kyle

      2 weeks ago

      If Mr. Snell says they are better, I’m in!!!!!!!

      Reply

      Marshall

      2 weeks ago

      Dean is about as conscientious and customer-centric a CEO as you’ll find in the golf world. Been gaming Snell since they launched. That first hand written thank from Dean exemplifies his passion and commitment to his customers. Can’t wait to try the new 2.0 and 3.0 !

      Reply

      Matt

      2 weeks ago

      I’m really looking forward to these! I’m right about 160y with the 7 iron, so the 3.0/4.0 test pack is what I will try first. Can’t wait!

      Reply

      Stev

      2 weeks ago

      I find Snell balls here and there, and they usually end up in the shag bag. Admittedly, I don’t know much about them. I do appreciate the price point, and that they acknowledged that there were issues and will actually try to fix them.

      Reply

      Greg P

      2 weeks ago

      Tried previous gen on the close out deal. Am pleasantly impressed. Shared with my playing partners who are equally so. Look forward to the new model.

      Reply

      Jay Nichols

      2 weeks ago

      Snell doesn’t make golf balls, he pays a company in Asia to manufacture balls, not cast urethane, but injection molded urethane. Snell can suggest different materials and process changes, but like everyone else, there’s a limit to ball costs that can’t be increased while selling it for a certain price point.
      Like Callaway, Snell can’t beat Pro V1, so he copies their font, and side stamp design. Also, Snell balls aren’t played on any tour, they don’t have to be conforming to USGA & R&A standards, so they can’t be compared.

      Reply

      Owen

      2 weeks ago

      Jay, you sound like a troll. Do you work for Titliest or Callaway?? The Snell ball is historically great. I was a HUGE FAN of the older MTB X ball. MGS had both of their older offerings near the top of their testing. Glad to hear Snell fixed the issues with their previous balls (everyone makes mistakes…right Callaway?!)

      Reply

      Michael Pasquill

      2 weeks ago

      I bought the Prime 2.0 for my slower swing speed. I plan on trying it out tomorrow and see how it performs. I played the E5 by Bridgestone a long time ago, I tried the saintnine golf balls too. I can give you some feedback if you like. I’m a senior golfer hope this helps.

      Reply

      Jake

      2 weeks ago

      can you kindly share our feedback on both B’stone E5 and Saint Nine two piece urethane golf balls? I would love to hear it.

      Hector Cyre

      2 weeks ago

      Uh, Jay – do you know who did the original engineering on the Pro V1? And on the Pro V1x? And on the Taylormade 5? Yup, Dean Snell. He has been in the business for decades, and his venture into his own brand was driven in part by the desire to make great golf balls available at reasonable prices. Perhaps you should give him a call sometime and just shoot the S#$t with him for a while. I did – years ago now. I came away really impressed by his knowledge, experience, and perspectives on various things related to golf balls.

      Reply

      Matt

      2 weeks ago

      Jay, Snell balls are conforming to USGA/R&A standards. Also Dean Snell was on the original design for the Pro V1, I’d say he knows what he’s doing.

      Reply

      Tim P

      2 weeks ago

      Snell are not on tour, because Dean Snell refuses to pay tour players to bag his product. That extra $30/dozen is your share of the titlesit sponsorship to all the tour players.

      Reply

      Dave Tutelman

      2 weeks ago

      Yessss! The Prime 2.0 sounds like what I need. Gotta try one. At age 82, my driving distance is down to about 185, and that’s a pretty low trajectory. So spin is my friend, even on the drive. And I’m not about to give up a urethane cover around the greens and for approach shots. This looks like the ball I need at a reasonable price point!

      Reply

      Gil Bloomer

      2 weeks ago

      It’s a rare thing nowadays for companies to listen to their customer base and react to their concerns. Great article noting that Dean Snell owned up to a less than stellar product, listened to his customers, and promptly fixed what was a poor quality product. This is a terrific article and hopefully the Snell Prime product line will be a success. Thanks MGS.

      Reply

      Daniel Sopchak

      2 weeks ago

      Basing a golf ball on how far you hit a seven iron is a really bad idea. My seven iron is 34° of loft. The new Taylor made QI seven iron is 28° of loft. The eight iron is 32° of loft so you’re someplace between eight and nine iron for what my seven iron is, they should base on whatever your ex degree loft club is. A 7 iron isn’t a 7 iron

      Reply

      Scott

      2 weeks ago

      I have already received a dozen of the Prime 3.0and put them in play last weekend.
      The cover issues are a thing of the past. On the old Prime, anything below a 9 iron would leave a chew mark in the ball. Now, they are just as durable as the old Snell Balls, the Black and MTB.
      I played 18 holes with one last weekend and the ball did great. Really held up well in the wind and one hopped and stopped on the greens. My only complaint is the ball sounds clicky off of the putter. But that is just nick picking. Ball is really good. May not unseat my gamer (Bridgestone XS) but I have not tried the new Bridgestone balls yet and these are a better price point.
      I will also say that this was the 1st article I read about the different pigment and I could easily see the difference in my ball and my partners ball. I think Dean did a really great job on these new golf balls. It’s not the Black that I absolutely loved to play, but I think these are the closest we are getting.

      Reply

      Greg

      2 weeks ago

      Canada coming…?

      Reply

      Kyle

      2 weeks ago

      If Mr. Snell says the issues are fixed, I’m IN!!!!!!

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    First Look
    May 14, 2024
    Stewart Adds Carbon to the Q Follow Range of Pushcarts
    Wilson Staff Model golf balls. Wilson Staff Model golf balls.
    Golf Balls
    May 14, 2024
    Wilson Staff Model Golf Balls: A MyGolfSpy “Just So” Story
    First Look
    May 14, 2024
    FootJoy Mints Special Todd Snyder Premiere Series Shoes