Golf Rangefinder vs. GPS: What Two Years Without A Rangefinder Taught Me
We Tried It

Golf Rangefinder vs. GPS: What Two Years Without A Rangefinder Taught Me

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Golf Rangefinder vs. GPS: What Two Years Without A Rangefinder Taught Me

A few years ago, I bought a Bushnell Wingman View for our golf cart.

At the time, it wasn’t really just for me. It was for everybody. I was the only one in the family with a rangefinder and trying to shoot yardages for myself, two kids and my husband was not exactly helping pace of play.

The Wingman View solved that problem almost immediately.

It gave everyone front, middle and back yardages. It stuck to the cart with a magnet that has never made me nervous. It worked as a speaker. It was easy. It was fast. It became one of those golf products that just stayed in the cart because everyone used it.

What I didn’t expect was that I would eventually prefer it to a rangefinder.

GPS changed the way I looked at greens

Before using GPS regularly, I don’t think I had a great understanding of how much room I really had on greens.

I knew the pin number and the club I wanted to hit.

What I didn’t always know was how much green I had short of the pin, how much room I had behind it or whether the smarter play was nowhere near the flag.

The Wingman View made that obvious.

Front, middle and back yardages sound simple but they changed how I played. I stopped hunting pins quite as much. I started hunting greens and it helped my scoring.

Instead of standing over a shot thinking, “It’s 142 to the flag,” I started thinking, “The front is 132, the middle is 146 and the back is 158.” I had more confidence that the club I had in my hand could land within that range.

For most amateur golfers, that is a much better way to play.

The Wingman View will also give you yardages to hazards, bunkers and other targets. I don’t use that feature all that often. You can also use the Bushnell app on your phone to get more detailed numbers but I don’t love bringing my phone out during a round.

For me, the value of the Wingman View is simple: I get the numbers I need without doing much.

Then I got a pin number again

Recently, my son and daughter have started walking the course more. My daughter has a Garmin kids’ watch and my son has a Shot Scope rangefinder.

A few holes into a round, my son was standing near me and I asked him for a yardage to the pin.

It was the first time I had a true “to the pin” number in a long time.

Secretly, I loved it.

There is something about one specific number that I like. But it also changes the way I play.

With GPS, I’m usually thinking about a zone. With a rangefinder, I’m thinking about a number.

Those are not the same thing.

By the end of the round, I had asked him for a few more yardages. That was when I realized I probably needed to bring a rangefinder back into play for a few rounds and see what happened.

The rangefinder changed my strategy

As soon as the rangefinder came back into play, I noticed a few things.

First, I got more aggressive.

Not reckless, exactly, but definitely more target-focused. A front, middle and back number makes me think about the whole green. A pin number makes me think about the flag.

Second, I cared more about exact shot placement.

If I needed to lay up short of a bunker, carry a corner or hit to a specific area, the rangefinder made that easier. I started planning a little more instead of just looking at the general number and playing.

I noticed the biggest difference on par 3s.

With GPS, I’m usually looking at front, middle and back. That makes me think about the green as a whole.

With a rangefinder, everything gets more specific. That can be helpful when the pin is accessible or when I feel like I can be more aggressive. It gives me a clear target and helps me commit to the shot.

It can also be dangerous. Sometimes that exact pin number makes you think the flag is the target when the better play is still the middle of the green.

If I could only choose one

If you told me I could only have one (rangefinder or GPS), I would choose the GPS.

For the way most amateur golfers play, I think GPS yardages are more useful more often. The pin is not the target nearly as often as we think it is. The green is the target. Sometimes the safe side of the green is the target.

GPS helps you see that.

A rangefinder gives you precision. GPS gives you context.

The best answer is probably to have both but, if I had to pick one, I would rather have front, middle and back yardages than one exact pin number. I should mention that the Tour V7 Shift is the best rangefinder I have owned. Previously, I had budget rangefinders that took longer, couldn’t find targets as easily and just didn’t have the same ease of use.

The Wingman View made golf simpler for me. The Tour V7 Shift makes it more precise.

Now I’m trying to find the right balance between the two.

Anybody else with me on this or are you completely the opposite? Do you trust the rangefinder more than GPS, or has GPS changed the way you play?

For You

For You

Srixon ZXi irons Srixon ZXi irons
Irons
Jul 20, 2026
Srixon’s New ZXi Irons Just Showed Up on Tour — Here’s What That Means
Ryan Fox WITB: Open Championship Ryan Fox WITB: Open Championship
News
Jul 20, 2026
Ryan Fox WITB: Inside The Open Champion’s Bag
Buyer's Guide
Jul 20, 2026
The 3 Most Accurate Player’s Distance Irons Of 2026
Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Britt Olizarowicz is a scratch golfer, former teaching professional and one of MyGolfSpy’s leading voices on equipment testing and golf performance. She has spent more than 15 years working at private clubs in New York and Florida and now specializes in translating test data and swing mechanics into practical advice for everyday golfers. Britt began playing at age 7 and has never left the game. When she’s not writing, you’ll find her on the course, playing pickleball, cooking, running or out on the boat with her family.

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Ash

      3 weeks ago

      The Precision Pro Titan rangefinder shows pin, front, back yardages on screen. It’s also a top class rangefinder by itself and the pin lock is excellent. The paired phone app shows a hole map w hazard.distances. icing on the cake is the app notifies you if you may have lost it or left it on the cart and shows you a map of its last seen location! I agree that I feel a bit lost without the gps numbers.

      Reply

      Don McNanna

      3 weeks ago

      Why choose? I use both. The rangefinder is not just for the flag. What’s the edge of the bunker guarding the green? Have to carry a stream going across the fairway? How about those Arthur Hills courses where a layup on one side is 170 and on the other side it’s 200?
      The combo is great for par 3’s and approach shots. I’ll get the flag with the rangefinder and front and back with the gps. Then I have about a 10 yard range to land it.
      (if I can -I’m about a 12)

      Reply

      Randall Merchant

      3 weeks ago

      Same with me. I have Garmin gps with green view. Using the range finder with gps gives me better idea about how much room I may have short and long from pin. Plus (and it may be my unsteady hands) the gps is useful to let me know what I need to clear traps, water, etc

      Reply

      Ash

      3 weeks ago

      Yes, playing an Arthur Hills course regularly (water crossing or in play on 17 holes), I really like to use the phone app hole map for the.hazard yardages particularly on diagonal hazards .

      Reply

      Bernie

      3 weeks ago

      Hi Writer(s) I clicked on “Patriotic Putter Grips” but it link takes you to the “Range Finders vs GPS
      Bernie

      Reply

      Peejer

      3 weeks ago

      I have a GPS watch to get front/middle/back, also distance to fairway bunkers/water. That’s a relatively quick glance, then I grab the rangefinder to find out what the ‘pin’ number is. We’ve all thought we hit the flag when we actually hit something behind it. So the quick glance gives me confidence when I hit the flag to know it was actually the flag. But, knowing what I need to cover a bunker, to get to a front pin is critical. I’ve been using both for years and will continue to do so.

      Reply

      Chris

      3 weeks ago

      using a Garmin watch I paired it with the Garmin range finder and it’s the best of both worlds. You shoot the flag and it will give you flag plus yards to the front and back all in the viewfinder. If they would just get over their stubborn refusal to integrate with GHIN it would be the perfect golf companion

      Reply

      Ken

      3 weeks ago

      I also prefer GPS. I’ve had a different versions SkyCaddie for 15 years and recently switched to a Pinned Caddie. I found I would pin hunt more with a rangefinder. My scores are better because of it and I can better assess distances to various hazards (to avoid) and keep my ball in play.

      Reply

      Jerry

      3 weeks ago

      I will always contend that a rangefinder is more flexible than GPS. First, front/middle/back are set in stone with no relation to the pin location. Second, and more important to my game, is the ability to measure “carry” yardage or other intermediate ranges. Several holes on my home course have water in front of greens. In cases where I know the green is out of my reach, I need to know can I realistically carry the water of should I lay up. GPS is no help to me there. Same for fairway bunkers or rock hogbacks.

      Reply

      Ken

      3 weeks ago

      Depends on the GPS I would assume. My SkyCaddie and Pinned Caddie can give me the distances to water hazards and traps since it showed the “map” of the course. I would assume on some basic GPS units all you get are the Front/Middle/Back measurements

      Reply

      Dave

      3 weeks ago

      Ken, what you said. If a GPS only gives front, middle and back yardages, it’s really not all that it could be. I can see layup points, hazard distances, etc. very easily with a good GPS app.

      Darren

      3 weeks ago

      I have read many an article of late arguing for GPS over a rangefinder, all citing a golfers seemingly inabilitly to take in any information other than blindly shooting at a flag that is for example 6 yards from the edge of a green, with a grand canyion like drop, that will inevitably swallow up your approach, and then on the whole ending their argument right there. However, in the many years I have played – backed up by data -amateurs, for lots of reasons – the most common being that many overestimate how long they hit a given club, and also a degree of vanity – almost always come up short of their intended target, even when a shot that is well struck. I have witnessed lots of GPS (only) users lean more towards what the front number shows. Not all, but lots. Conversly, a range finder user (only) tends to have a better success rate at getting deeper into the green as, like I have said above, most amateurs come up short. I use a rangefinder and a Garmin S60, to calculate all variables on offer, yet if I had to choose out of the two, the rangefinder wins as you can scan front, a bunker to carry, and pin with one device.

      Reply

      Michael Ross

      3 weeks ago

      I use both GPS and a rangefinder. If I had to choose I’d go with the GPS for the reasons stated. Also, because I score on my GPS. I can track fairways, GIR & putts. I also use the hazards info.

      Reply

      Todd Early

      3 weeks ago

      I have a garmin watch and a shot scope rangefinder. I have found through the years that the pin placement sheets at our club can occasionally be off. There is an uphill approach on half the holes and often hard to tell where the pin is located. I know where the trouble is around the greens. The rangefinder tells me exactly how far, the GPS lets me know what is the safest miss.

      Reply

      Pete S

      3 weeks ago

      Get a rangefinder that also has GPS. Problem solved.

      Reply

      Gary

      3 weeks ago

      Agree with Pete. Bushnell has both in a rangefinder

      Reply

      UpstateNewYork

      3 weeks ago

      As a 30 hcp player, having front and back of the green numbers is the best. I have no business trying to do anything but hit a green. :D

      Reply

      Mike

      3 weeks ago

      I had a wingman and it got lost at some point last season but I still use the Bushnell app. I think the front mid, back numbers and a good view of the green is way more helpful than the pin yardage. The ability to view the greeen shape and any issue around it as I walk to my next shot is also helpful to get prepared and speed play as well.
      Now I just gotta get myself a new speaker to replace the missing one.

      Reply

      Sveinn Orri Snæland

      3 weeks ago

      I have always used a rangefinder, but for the last years I have had a shotscope V2, V3, X5 and now V5 with GPS and that has made me think more about the space from pin to front or back and trying, and usually failing, to place the ball between the pin and the side of the green that has more space. Golf Digest has a video on how to play difficult holes, and I really think everyone should play accordingly, even if I play off scratch, the rounds just get so much easier when you hit the green, even if the chip is easy. I have occasionally lost battery power on the rangefinder, and I totally agree that when you are singularly thinking about the middle of the green, it can bring a certain calmness which often pays off rather than attacking the pin.

      Reply

      Scott

      3 weeks ago

      I want to be in the same boat, but I live in Pennsylvania and most courses have some decent elevation changes, so GPS is only 75% accurate. But I totally agree with your assessment that the front/middle/back is better for most games than exact pin yardage. I’d also love to have my phone back in my bag, so I’d need to figure out how to track my score & stats.

      Reply

      Dave

      3 weeks ago

      Yes, I prefer and use GPS over the free rangefinder that I won. I target the front middle yardage so that I can play the bounce towards the flag. The middle yardage tells me I have x number of yards between my aim and what the bounce may add to it. This amateur is never going to be able to stop a ball on a dime like the pro’s.

      Reply

      DaVe

      3 weeks ago

      I’m a GPS and rangefinder guy. The GPS numbers are dependent on how accurate the receiver is determining where you are and how accurate the map of the course is. The errors can add up to a significant number. The GPS map is good for seeing the layout of the hole and plan layup shots. When I’m wedge/short iron distance out from the green, or if there is significant elevation change, I’ll verify the distance with the rangefinder. (For the record, I’m an amateur playing to a 15-ish index and my approach shots basically stop where they land… wedge shots will spin back too.)

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Srixon ZXi irons Srixon ZXi irons
    Irons
    Jul 20, 2026
    Srixon’s New ZXi Irons Just Showed Up on Tour — Here’s What That Means
    Ryan Fox WITB: Open Championship Ryan Fox WITB: Open Championship
    News
    Jul 20, 2026
    Ryan Fox WITB: Inside The Open Champion’s Bag
    Buyer's Guide
    Jul 20, 2026
    The 3 Most Accurate Player’s Distance Irons Of 2026