Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.
42 drivers. 490 hours. 20,580 shots. 411,600 data points.
Our findings from the world’s largest independent driver test are in. Now, we dive deeper into the data to identify the top-performing drivers specifically for golfers with slow swing speeds.
Is your driver swing speed below 90 mph? If so, this evaluation is for YOU.
Independent, data-driven testing is the heart and soul of MyGolfSpy. Each Most Wanted Test is the most comprehensive, independently conducted review in golf. Don’t take our word for it. Take it from our 18 million readers across the world who are golfers just like you and me.
Our data-driven tests are backed by more than a decade of testing experience and expertise. We are the industry leader in independent testing.
At MyGolfSpy, our mission is golfer first. You, the consumer, are our sole priority. Every Most Wanted Test has one goal: to cut through marketing BS, to let data determine which products are superior and which are inferior. And, most importantly, to empower you, the consumer, with the best knowledge prior to your next golf club purchase.
Hype is noise. Our cold, hard data squashes the noise. Are you ready?
These are the best drivers of 2026 for — slow swing speeds.

If you’re considering buying a new driver, it needs to outperform your current driver. It is that simple. The best drivers produce consistent performance across all three of our scoring categories. They provide distance. They are accurate. They are forgiving. These are the ingredients you need and should want in your next driver. These are the best drivers of 2026.
The LA GOLF Driver stands out as the ultimate all-around performer, particularly excelling for golfers with slower swing speeds. It delivers the consistent and reliable performance essential for a great round of golf, combining exceptional distance, accuracy, and forgiveness.
For slow swing speed players, the LA GOLF Driver's performance is exceptional, leaving little room for criticism. Despite this, the overall status of LA GOLF is currently uncertain, which may make the LA GOLF Driver difficult to purchase at this time.
The LA GOLF Driver delivered a surprising performance in our 2026 Most Wanted Driver test, earning the distinction of being the most accurate driver tested—a result few anticipated. This driver’s impressive showing continues in the slow swing speed analysis, where it emerges as the top-performing model for golfers in this category. While it didn’t secure a direct win in any single scoring category, the LA GOLF Driver consistently ranked in the top five for accuracy, distance, and forgiveness.
“Very forgiving and consistent. Seemed like no matter where I hit it on the face I was getting the same result. Great dispersion.”
“Sneaky long, great sound, and straight.”
“Very consistent, great launch, not much side spin — surprisingly good.”
The LA GOLF Driver is arguably my biggest surprise in the driver category this year. It genuinely lives up to the buzz, particularly standing out as the best option for golfers with slow swing speeds. In this scenario, its slight deficit in ball speed doesn’t negatively impact its distance performance. A major concern, however, is the current uncertainty regarding product availability. If you manage to find one, this driver is an absolute must-try.
Distance sells. It always will. Golfers remember the longest drivers they hit. Well, if you fall under the slow swing speed category, Srixon ZXi can be a solution to longer drives. Go check it out today.
Forgiveness in golf is a nuanced concept. What exactly does it signify? Our testing provides a quantifiable answer by analyzing key metrics on every driver shot, including ball speed deltas, carry distance deltas, and dispersion. Drivers that perform well across these metrics are considered highly forgiving. Regrettably, the Srixon ZXi performed slightly below average in this critical area.
For golfers with slow swing speeds, the Srixon ZXi driver stands out as a clear leader in distance. While limited speed can often restrict tee distance, the ZXi is the one driver to test if maximizing yardage is the goal, securing its second-place overall ranking largely due to its high distance score. Notably, golfers shouldn’t hesitate to consider it, as the ZXi also performs exceptionally well in accuracy.
“Plain profile that makes the head appear more compact. Solid driver.”
“Like the deft look on the crown and it is extremely straight.”
“A great option if you want to go against the grain. Swing speed is up relative to others. Ball speed is there.”
For golfers with slow swing speeds seeking maximum distance, the Srixon ZXi is a standout choice. It establishes significant separation from its competitors in this category, offering nearly four yards more distance than the next closest driver. If distance is your priority, the Srixon ZXi is an absolute must-try.
The Srixon ZXi Max is the top driver for accuracy, making it essential for hitting fairways and keeping drives in play—both are key to shooting lower scores. Beyond just finding the short grass, however, the ZXi Max also excels at delivering playable shot outcomes with high efficiency.
Most golfers prioritize distance, which is an undeniable fact. While the Srixon ZXi Max is extremely accurate, its middle-of-the-pack distance performance may be a dealbreaker for some. If distance is your primary concern, you should consider other driver options.
The Srixon ZXi Max is a standout driver, quietly establishing itself as a formidable driver option. Its exceptional forgiveness was evident in our overall Most Wanted Driver results. Specifically for golfers with slower swing speeds, the ZXi Max proved to be the most accurate driver and a top choice for forgiveness. These findings collectively highlight the high quality and performance benefits the Srixon ZXi Max offers to golfers.
“A little higher launching, which suits my game. Solid driver.”
“Solid driver and it has a great feel.”
“Definitely forgiving off the face, especially toe strikes.”
Srixon ZXi Max is the best driver for accuracy in our slow swing speed breakdown. Additionally, it is a top performer for forgiveness. This reaffirms ZXi Max’s forgiveness performance in our overall Most Wanted Driver test. If you are looking for consistency in a driver, Srixon ZXi Max is one of the best options on the market. Period.

Distance is straightforward: carry and total distance.
As golfers, we are always chasing more distance. Is it the five, 10 or 15 yards we continue to hear from manufacturers? No. However, there are drivers that offer distance more consistently than others on the market. It is the one performance trait where this is an undeniable separation in performance.
Here are the best drivers for distance.
Distance sells. It always will. Golfers remember the longest drivers they hit. Well, if you fall under the slow swing speed category, Srixon ZXi can be a solution to longer drives. Go check it out today.
Forgiveness in golf is a nuanced concept. What exactly does it signify? Our testing provides a quantifiable answer by analyzing key metrics on every driver shot, including ball speed deltas, carry distance deltas, and dispersion. Drivers that perform well across these metrics are considered highly forgiving. Regrettably, the Srixon ZXi performed slightly below average in this critical area.
For golfers with slow swing speeds, the Srixon ZXi driver stands out as a clear leader in distance. While limited speed can often restrict tee distance, the ZXi is the one driver to test if maximizing yardage is the goal, securing its second-place overall ranking largely due to its high distance score. Notably, golfers shouldn’t hesitate to consider it, as the ZXi also performs exceptionally well in accuracy.
“Plain profile that makes the head appear more compact. Solid driver.”
“Like the deft look on the crown and it is extremely straight.”
“A great option if you want to go against the grain. Swing speed is up relative to others. Ball speed is there.”
For golfers with slow swing speeds seeking maximum distance, the Srixon ZXi is a standout choice. It establishes significant separation from its competitors in this category, offering nearly four yards more distance than the next closest driver. If distance is your priority, the Srixon ZXi is an absolute must-try.
The Takomo IGNIS D1 is a notable newcomer to the 2026 driver market, immediately standing out with its performance. Typically, initial performance isn't remarkable, but this driver bucks that trend. Offering excellent value, the IGNIS D1 delivers well-balanced performance, particularly in terms of distance, making it unquestionably a great buy in a competitive field.
The timing is unfortunate; the Takomo IGNIS D1 is currently unavailable on Takomo's website. Given the company's evident success, we are hopeful a restock will be announced soon.
The Takomo IGNIS D1 is an unexpected, value-packed contender in the driver market. This driver achieved a well-rounded performance in our slow swing speed testing, ranking fifth overall due to its balance of distance, accuracy, and forgiveness. Notably, the IGNIS D1 excelled in distance, finishing second in this key performance area.
“Love the feel, consistent,, but I wish it was gloss.”
“For the price, it is worth the try. Great budget option. Ball speed is better than some other DTC brands.”
“Impressive, shockingly good, held its own. Price wise, I’d consider it.”
Takomo has emerged as one of the hottest golf manufacturers outside of the “power five” OEMs. Their IGNIS D1 driver certainly made a lasting impression in our testing. Specifically, it secured the second overall spot for distance and ranked fifth in our comprehensive slow swing speed analysis. There is one significant drawback, however: the driver is currently out of stock. Keep a close eye out for a restock—this is a driver you will definitely want to get your hands on.

Just because we weigh distance slightly more than accuracy does not mean you should neglect it. Ignoring accuracy is a huge mistake for most golfers. Keeping the ball in play leads to better scores. Furthermore, the best drivers for distance tend to be more accurate than other competitors.
Accuracy is a blend. Hitting fairways is key. Producing playable shot outcomes is equally important. Are your drives landing and coming to rest in playable conditions? This is what we are evaluating for driver accuracy.
Here are the best drivers for accuracy.
The Srixon ZXi Max is the top driver for accuracy, making it essential for hitting fairways and keeping drives in play—both are key to shooting lower scores. Beyond just finding the short grass, however, the ZXi Max also excels at delivering playable shot outcomes with high efficiency.
Most golfers prioritize distance, which is an undeniable fact. While the Srixon ZXi Max is extremely accurate, its middle-of-the-pack distance performance may be a dealbreaker for some. If distance is your primary concern, you should consider other driver options.
The Srixon ZXi Max is a standout driver, quietly establishing itself as a formidable driver option. Its exceptional forgiveness was evident in our overall Most Wanted Driver results. Specifically for golfers with slower swing speeds, the ZXi Max proved to be the most accurate driver and a top choice for forgiveness. These findings collectively highlight the high quality and performance benefits the Srixon ZXi Max offers to golfers.
“A little higher launching, which suits my game. Solid driver.”
“Solid driver and it has a great feel.”
“Definitely forgiving off the face, especially toe strikes.”
Srixon ZXi Max is the best driver for accuracy in our slow swing speed breakdown. Additionally, it is a top performer for forgiveness. This reaffirms ZXi Max’s forgiveness performance in our overall Most Wanted Driver test. If you are looking for consistency in a driver, Srixon ZXi Max is one of the best options on the market. Period.
The LA GOLF Driver stands out as the ultimate all-around performer, particularly excelling for golfers with slower swing speeds. It delivers the consistent and reliable performance essential for a great round of golf, combining exceptional distance, accuracy, and forgiveness.
For slow swing speed players, the LA GOLF Driver's performance is exceptional, leaving little room for criticism. Despite this, the overall status of LA GOLF is currently uncertain, which may make the LA GOLF Driver difficult to purchase at this time.
The LA GOLF Driver delivered a surprising performance in our 2026 Most Wanted Driver test, earning the distinction of being the most accurate driver tested—a result few anticipated. This driver’s impressive showing continues in the slow swing speed analysis, where it emerges as the top-performing model for golfers in this category. While it didn’t secure a direct win in any single scoring category, the LA GOLF Driver consistently ranked in the top five for accuracy, distance, and forgiveness.
“Very forgiving and consistent. Seemed like no matter where I hit it on the face I was getting the same result. Great dispersion.”
“Sneaky long, great sound, and straight.”
“Very consistent, great launch, not much side spin — surprisingly good.”
The LA GOLF Driver is arguably my biggest surprise in the driver category this year. It genuinely lives up to the buzz, particularly standing out as the best option for golfers with slow swing speeds. In this scenario, its slight deficit in ball speed doesn’t negatively impact its distance performance. A major concern, however, is the current uncertainty regarding product availability. If you manage to find one, this driver is an absolute must-try.

What makes a golf club, specifically a driver, forgiving?
Our industry-leading standard for defining forgiveness analyzes three specific metrics: carry distance deltas, ball speed deltas and shot area (aka dispersion).
Each of these metrics showcases how well a driver produces similar shot outcomes over time. Essentially, we are boiling it down to this:
How consistent is a driver?
Here are the best drivers for forgiveness.
Consistency is crucial in a golf club, and the Titleist GT1 driver delivers reliable performance on every shot. Its consistent performance makes it the best driver for forgiveness in our slow swing speed breakdown.
The Titleist GT1 driver presents a complex case for forgiveness. While it is certainly forgiving, it performs only averagely in terms of distance and accuracy. This highlights a nuanced point about forgiveness: a driver can offer high consistency in shot outcomes, yet still fall short of its competitors when considering overall distance and accuracy. Therefore, any golfer seriously interested in the Titleist GT1 should undergo a professional fitting to maximize its potential for distance and accuracy.
The Titleist GT1 is engineered for golfers with slower swing speeds. This lightweight driver delivers strong performance. In our 2026 slow swing speed analysis, the GT1 stands out as the top-ranked driver for forgiveness. This exceptional consistency is demonstrated by its performance across key forgiveness metrics: ball speed deltas, carry distance deltas, and dispersion.
“Loved the looks and I can’t find anything wrong with it. Feel is great and it is my favorite driver so far.”
“Most consistent, very forgiving, but it is too shiny for my liking.”
“Very consistent. Straight. Not a fan of the head shape.”
Titleist GT1 is the best driving for forgiveness in our slow swing speed evaluation. This means you can expect consistent performance across the face and reliable shot outcomes. It isn’t the longest or the straightest driver in this portion of our driver evaluation. So, if you are considering the GT1, we recommend a professional fitting. Personally, I’ve found a fitting key to unlocking Titleist’s full potential.
The PING G440 SFT driver is a consistent, playable option, particularly for golfers who currently struggle off the tee. While it may not be the most exciting driver on the market, its predictable shot outcomes can provide an immediate and significant confidence boost.
While the PING G440 SFT delivers exceptional reliability and consistency—which is its design focus—it falls short in terms of distance. Distance is a key scoring metric in our assessment, and the G440 SFT performs below average when compared to its competitors.
For golfers with slower swing speeds seeking forgiveness, the PING G440 SFT is a top-tier driver. While it may not be the longest option available, its consistency makes it a highly reliable choice. Furthermore, its draw-bias design is an excellent feature for players who struggle with a slice, making it a truly outstanding driver option for that demographic.
“I like it. Most consistent and forgiving.”
“Extremely consistent from short to long & left to right. Not the longest driver on the market.”
“Love the feel and weighting. I had good control with the PING and it had a nice draw shaping. I’d buy this model.”
PING G440 SFT is the driver you buy if you’re struggling with driver in general, especially slower swinging golfers. It is extremely consistent and offers a draw-biased nature. Yet, PING does allow this driver to be less draw-bias than previous iterations and this shows up in our testing. G440 SFT is a great driver and if you’re willing to spend a few extra bones, it can become a safety blanket in your golf bag.

How to Choose a Golf Driver
Our mission is to cut through the subjective BS and encourage golfers to buy based on performance. Performance should be your top priority. Period. However, there are other things you need to consider when purchasing a new driver.
If you’re new to golf, it can be useful to understand the parts of a driver. Golf drivers consist of several parts: the clubhead, the shaft and the grip. The clubhead is the portion that actually strikes the ball and is often made from materials such as titanium or composite blends.
The hosel connects the head to the shaft, which can vary in length and is commonly constructed from steel or graphite. The grip can be chosen separately and you can always regrip your clubs. And if you really want to go the custom route, you can add a unique ferrule, too.

Driver price points are quite the talking point nowadays. Most drivers are hovering at US$600. There are several that exceed that price, even before you think about upgrading to an aftermarket shaft.
Thankfully, there are value alternatives, especially as more direct-to-consumer offerings become available.
Now that we are in 2026 and all of the 2026 driver models have been released, many of the best drivers featured in last year’s test are on sale. Take a look at our brand-specific promo code and golf deal pages to get the best price on a new driver for your game.
Choosing the right driver shaft is a daunting task. The landscape and information surrounding shaft selection and fitting is also shifting. For example, TaylorMade’s approach to shaft fitting based on “closure rate.” Certainly, there are other OEM’s with research on this approach, but TaylorMade is attempting to be a leader in the space with their stock shaft selection.
Regardless of the approach, you want the driver shaft that allows you to perform consistently. Here at MyGolfSpy, we test from an “off-the-rack” or “from stock” approach. The driver shaft and the loft of the driver head create a partnership. That partnership needs to allow you to produce consistent shot outcomes.

The traditional approach is to evaluate launch conditions, a proven approach. For example, if you don’t generate enough spin, launch angle or peak height with your driver, you want to add loft and even a driver shaft that helps raise all of the above data metrics.
Ultimately, you should not neglect the importance of the driver shaft.
No one else does testing like MyGolfSpy. Who else is committing 490 hours to test 42 driver models? Yes, that is how much time and dedication it takes to execute a Most Wanted Driver Test. We don’t take it lightly.
For 2026, the testing pool includes 42 different driver models. This is our largest driver testing pool in our history.
MyGolfSpy’s test program is powered by three crucial components :
For driver testing, we have 35 testers. Since a driver is marketed to all golfers, our testing pool includes golfers of varying swing speeds and skill levels. Due to the scale of this test, each tester committed to 14 appointments to complete the driver test. All 35 testers hit each of the 42 drivers.

Providing you, the golfer and consumer, with insights into the best drivers on the market is our No. 1 goal with this test. We can’t do that without taking a diligent, in-depth approach to analyzing the data we collect throughout this process.
Our scoring categories remain the same and we will review those below.
Overall scores are labeled as a MGS Score. The MGS Score is on a 10-point scale.
Driver testing is comprised of three scoring categories:
These three categories are weighted with distance taking a slight priority over accuracy.
Maximizing driver distance is every golfer’s goal. For our distance category, we evaluate two specific metrics:
Being accurate off the tee can be a game changer. For our accuracy category, we analyze two specific metrics:
We label forgiveness as how consistent a driver is at producing consistent shot outcomes. For our forgiveness category, we assess three specific metrics:
Scores are derived strictly from ball launch monitor data by way of our Efficiency Values. Efficiency Values are a cleaner version and representation of raw average as they remove golf ball data and clubhead data outliers from the equation.
With this being said, scores are weighted with 40 percent of the score coming from distance metrics, 35 percent from our accuracy metrics and the remaining 25 percent from our forgiveness metrics. You can reference the specific metrics within each scoring category in the previous heading section.
Finally, we reserve a very small percentage of the score to account for things like fitting considerations, excessive amounts of outliers and other details that fall outside the scope of the data.

Our driver test is one of the longest, most extensive, tests we do. Here are seven key takeaways after 490 hours of testing:
1. Underdogs take center stage
The top five drivers in our slow swing speed analysis are drivers that are underdogs.
Ultimately, the proof is in the data. LA GOLF Driver offers all around performance for slower swinging golfers. Srixon ZXi and ZXi Max excel in specific scoring categories. Takomo IGNIS D1 is sneaky good. PXG Lightening Max Lite is phenomenal for accuracy.
If you’re looking to shake things up, this is the chance to do so with a driver.

All 42 drivers feature an adjustable hosel at a minimum. Several also include moveable weights which allow for shot shape correction or a shift in CG location to change launch conditions.
COBRA still leads the way with adaptor sleeve innovation. Their FutureFit33 features 33 unique loft and lie adjustments to help dial in your driver.
Even the likes of Takomo Ignis D1, Ben Hogan, and MacGregor offer drivers with adjustable hosels. It is a no-brainer to have and hopefully the industry continues this trend.
TaylorMade Qi4D claims the top spot for 2026. It builds on the momentum of the TaylorMade R7 Quad mini driver, an absolute beast in the mini driver space.
Arguably, its top rival Callaway is the most impressive brand top to bottom for 2026. All four of Callaway’s Quantum drivers finish in the top seven in our rankings. Callaway Quantum Max is the best core model driver from Callaway in years.

LA GOLF, Vice Golf and Takomo Golf all had first-generation drivers in our 2026 Most Wanted Driver test. Each of them were impressive in their own way.
LA GOLF is the best driver for slow swing speeds. Remember the PING G430 Max 10K? There were moments in testing where our staff thought LA GOLF might pull out the overall victory. It lacks overall distance relative to other top performers. However, its lack of ball speed doesn’t hurt it too greatly in the slow swing speed breakdown.

Vice Golf has two drivers: VGD01 and VGD01+. VGD01+ is a phenomenal option for distance. Slow swing speed golfers should proceed with caution when considering these two drivers.
Takomo Golf Ignis D1 is our choice for best value for slow swing speed golfers. For $319.99, it is a great value option. Ignis D1 holds its own for distance and ball speed.
10K MOI is still relevant. For 2026, we saw Wilson and PXG add “10K” driver models to their lineups. PING introduced their newest option as well, PING G440 K. Even Tour Edge Exotics Max has “10K” stamped on it. Oh, and don’t forget COBRA OPTM Max-K.
Each of these drivers can find a place in someone’s golf bag. If you want to go with a high MOI driver, Tour Edge Exotics Max, PING G440 K and COBRA OPTM Max-K are the best options.
Remember, MOI is just a number. It doesn’t convey the entire forgiveness or performance story.
It’s neither a surprise nor a secret that not all manufacturers put the same effort (money) into their stock shaft lineup. While having more options doesn’t guarantee better performance (the head still has to perform), even for the off-the-rack buyer, a more robust shaft lineup is an advantage.
For some golfers, sometimes many golfers, drivers don’t do what they’re supposed to. There’s design and there’s perception. What I mean by that is that if something in the design of a driver – things like face angle, lie angle, even the way the top line presents at address – causes a golfer to change something in his setup, the real-world result can differ from the design intent.
It’s the reason why we sometimes see draw-biased drivers produce fade-biased results and why “better player” drivers with small shapes and open faces can sometimes go left.
| Driver | MGS Score | Distance Score | Accuracy Score | Forgiveness Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA GOLF Driver | 9.4 | 9.1 | 9.6 | 9.5 |
| Srixon ZXi | 9.2 | 9.8 | 9.2 | 8.4 |
| Srixon ZXi Max | 9.1 | 8.5 | 9.8 | 9.2 |
| PXG Lightning Max Lite | 9.1 | 8.8 | 9.4 | 9.1 |
| Takomo Ignis D1 | 9.0 | 9.3 | 8.7 | 8.9 |
| PING G440 MAX | 8.9 | 8.4 | 9.4 | 9.1 |
| PXG Lightning Tour Mid | 8.9 | 8.4 | 9.2 | 9.4 |
| Wilson DYNAPWR Max | 8.9 | 9.0 | 8.7 | 9.0 |
| Titleist GT1 | 8.8 | 8.6 | 8.5 | 9.8 |
| TaylorMade Qi4D | 8.8 | 9.1 | 8.4 | 9.0 |
| Callaway Quantum Triple Diamond | 8.8 | 8.8 | 8.9 | 8.5 |
| PING G440 SFT | 8.7 | 8.2 | 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Tour Edge Exotics Max | 8.7 | 9.0 | 8.1 | 9.2 |
| Vice Golf VGD01 | 8.7 | 8.2 | 8.9 | 9.1 |
| COBRA OPTM Max-K | 8.6 | 8.3 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Wilson DYNAPWR Carbon | 8.6 | 9.1 | 8.9 | 7.4 |
| COBRA OPTM LS | 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Titleist GT2 | 8.6 | 9.2 | 8.3 | 8.0 |
| Titleist GT3 | 8.6 | 8.7 | 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Callaway Quantum Max | 8.5 | 8.5 | 8.7 | 8.4 |
| PXG Lightning Tour | 8.5 | 8.4 | 8.6 | 8.5 |
| TaylorMade Qi4D LS | 8.5 | 8.5 | 8.3 | 8.8 |
| PING G440 K | 8.5 | 8.6 | 8.7 | 8.0 |
| Tour Edge Exotics LS | 8.4 | 7.9 | 9.1 | 8.2 |
| MacGregor Tourney Max | 8.4 | 8.3 | 9.1 | 7.5 |
| TaylorMade Qi4D Max Lite | 8.3 | 8.1 | 8.0 | 9.2 |
| TaylorMade Qi4D Max | 8.3 | 8.0 | 8.7 | 8.3 |
| PXG Lightning Max 10K+ | 8.3 | 8.6 | 8.4 | 7.9 |
| Ben Hogan PTx LST | 8.3 | 7.9 | 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Vice Golf VGD01+ | 8.3 | 8.8 | 8.3 | 7.4 |
| Wilson DYNAPWR LS | 8.2 | 8.8 | 7.9 | 7.8 |
| Mizuno JPX One | 8.2 | 8.2 | 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Ben Hogan PTx Max | 8.2 | 8.2 | 8.5 | 7.7 |
| PING G440 LST | 8.2 | 8.4 | 7.3 | 9.1 |
| Callaway Quantum Triple Diamond Max | 8.1 | 8.3 | 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Wilson DYNAPWR Max + | 8.1 | 8.6 | 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Srixon ZXi LS | 8.0 | 8.2 | 8.1 | 7.6 |
| Titleist GT4 | 8.0 | 8.6 | 7.0 | 8.5 |
| Callaway Quantum Max D | 7.9 | 8.2 | 7.6 | 8.2 |
| COBRA OPTM X | 7.9 | 7.9 | 8.2 | 7.6 |
| COBRA OPTM Max-D | 7.9 | 7.1 | 8.7 | 8.0 |
| Mizuno JPX One Select | 7.7 | 7.8 | 6.7 | 8.9 |
| Club | Carry (yds) | Total (yds) | Ball Speed (mph) | Back Spin (rpm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ben Hogan PTx LST | 177.02 | 197.24 | 115.86 | 2423 |
| Ben Hogan PTx Max | 181.99 | 195.38 | 115.38 | 2411 |
| Callaway Quantum Max | 181.02 | 199.36 | 115.83 | 2084 |
| Callaway Quantum Max D | 180.97 | 195.8 | 116.43 | 2197 |
| Callaway Quantum Triple Diamond | 182.5 | 201.19 | 117.74 | 2234 |
| Callaway Quantum Triple Diamond Max | 180.84 | 197.98 | 117.12 | 2354 |
| COBRA OPTM LS | 182.96 | 198.27 | 116.69 | 2461 |
| COBRA OPTM Max-D | 176.27 | 189.92 | 115.78 | 2475 |
| COBRA OPTM Max-K | 182.81 | 195.48 | 115.75 | 2495 |
| COBRA OPTM X | 180.54 | 193.46 | 115.79 | 2421 |
| LA GOLF LA GOLF Driver | 185.5 | 201.25 | 117.78 | 2593 |
| MacGregor Tourney Max | 181.12 | 197.4 | 116.15 | 2315 |
| Mizuno JPX One | 181.27 | 195.85 | 117.56 | 2893 |
| Mizuno JPX One Select | 178.93 | 194.09 | 116.89 | 2573 |
| PING G440 K | 184.98 | 196.7 | 117.4 | 2543 |
| PING G440 LST | 181.02 | 198.11 | 116.18 | 2262 |
| PING G440 MAX | 183.8 | 195.3 | 117.5 | 2696 |
| PING G440 SFT | 183.21 | 194.25 | 117.6 | 2683 |
| PXG Lightning Max 10K+ | 183.73 | 197.65 | 117.2 | 2485 |
| PXG Lightning Max Lite | 183.62 | 199.62 | 117.88 | 2340 |
| PXG Lightning Tour | 182.19 | 197.55 | 116.07 | 2308 |
| PXG Lightning Tour Mid | 181.38 | 197.93 | 117.05 | 2354 |
| Srixon ZXi | 189.09 | 204.36 | 119.13 | 2548 |
| Srixon ZXi LS | 181.4 | 196.36 | 116.43 | 2489 |
| Srixon ZXi Max | 183.06 | 197.44 | 117 | 2723 |
| Takomo Ignis D1 | 186.66 | 201.77 | 118.05 | 2340 |
| TaylorMade Qi4D | 186.74 | 199.54 | 117.63 | 2417 |
| TaylorMade Qi4D LS | 182.41 | 198.16 | 118.23 | 2521 |
| TaylorMade Qi4D Max | 180.1 | 195.26 | 116.79 | 2552 |
| TaylorMade Qi4D Max Lite | 183.01 | 193.46 | 116.5 | 2349 |
| Titleist GT1 | 185.13 | 196.46 | 117.47 | 2730 |
| Titleist GT2 | 187.06 | 200.8 | 118.5 | 2423 |
| Titleist GT3 | 184.2 | 198.12 | 118.43 | 2504 |
| Titleist GT4 | 182.69 | 198.7 | 118.59 | 2407 |
| Tour Edge Exotics LS | 179.28 | 195.21 | 115.28 | 2189 |
| Tour Edge Exotics Max | 185.95 | 199.5 | 118.5 | 2601 |
| Vice Golf VGD01 | 178.91 | 198.13 | 117.63 | 2210 |
| Vice Golf VGD01+ | 182.6 | 201.33 | 118.38 | 2144 |
| Wilson DYNAPWR Carbon | 185.36 | 201.8 | 117.25 | 2160 |
| Wilson DYNAPWR LS | 182.88 | 200.35 | 115.93 | 2351 |
| Wilson DYNAPWR Max | 185.51 | 199.78 | 117.29 | 2357 |
| Wilson DYNAPWR Max + | 183.78 | 197.26 | 117.1 | 2483 |
Here are some quick insights to help you better navigate your next hitting bay experience.
Good Looks Don’t Equal Good Performance – Don’t overvalue looks. Golfers tell us all the time they can’t hit a club well if they don’t like how it looks but we’ve found very little evidence to suggest this is true. Very often, golfers produce outstanding results with clubs they claim to despise. Keep an open mind about a club that you may not find visually appealing.
World-class testing requires world-class equipment. This is the gear we trust to help us fulfill our Most Wanted testing.
2 months ago
I do not understand how ratings can change so much from 2025 to 2026. 2025, ZXi distance , 8.0, 2026, 9.8.
Last year Ping G440 LST at the top of the list, this year middle of the pack. Many of the same drivers have totally different numbers YoY. Another example, Srixon ZXi 2025 total distance187 yds, this year 204? Hard to really determine what is what
2 months ago
Just heard from our rep that the ZXi woods are actually going down in price tomorrow. Good timing!
2 months ago
What happened to the Ping 440 K and the Ping HL K drivers
2 months ago
The test was carried out using Pro V1, Should slow swing players be using them?
2 months ago
The one brand that only makes clubs for slow swings – XXIO – was excluded from the test. How very odd.
2 months ago
I’m curious how the various HL drivers compare against a non-HL drivers in the slow swing speed category. I agree you need a good head on your driver to match a good head on your shoulders, but I’m pretty sure shaft plays a big role. I highly suggest getting fitted for a shaft. Makes a huge difference.
2 months ago
It would be nice to know what Shaft was used in each driver and the flex and also what the loft was for each driver
2 months ago
Why wasn’t XXIO included ??
2 months ago
XXIO is Srixon for those asking
2 months ago
The XXIO clubs are completely different products from the Srixon branded clubs.
2 months ago
My question also. I have a 14 year old XXIO that still holds it’s own against current drivers.
2 months ago
Nice to see Takomo on the list. There’s a lot of good deals to be had if you’re on a budget.
2 months ago
Which Face ID profile was used in the test? 10-10?
Bryan Hughes
2 months ago
I would like to see the same tests done with 95mph swing speeds.