Ball Lab: Srixon Z-Star (2023)
Golf Balls

Ball Lab: Srixon Z-Star (2023)

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Ball Lab: Srixon Z-Star (2023)

MyGolfSpy Ball Lab is where we quantify the quality and consistency of golf balls. Today, we’re reviewing the 2023 Srixon Z-Star. To learn more about our test process, click here.

About the Srixon Z-Star

The Srixon Z-Star is the softest of the company’s premium (“tour”) offerings.

According to Srixon, the standard Z-Star should be the lowest-flying of its three Z-Star models. Iron spin is listed as high (as it almost always is). Greenside spin is listed as the highest within the Z-Star family.

All of the balls we purchased were made at Srixon’s Indonesian factory. The data we’ve collected to date suggests (though it does not prove) that quality control isn’t quite as good as it is in the company’s Japanese factory.

A photo showing the 3 layers of the Srixon Z-Star

Srixon Z-Star Construction

The Srixon Z-Star is a three-piece ball with a 338-dimple urethane cover.

Because Srixon colors its mantle layers to match its covers, some believe the Z-Star is a two-piece ball. While the price tag should make it abundantly clear regardless, the picture above is meant to hammer the point home.

Compression

A 2023 Srixon z-Star in the MyGolfSpy compression gauge

On our gauge, the 2023 Srixon Z-Star measures 85 compression, making it the softest Z-Star we’ve measured to date (the prior version clocked in at 87). While we’d classify that as “firm” overall, it’s relatively soft by tour ball standards.

For reference, it’s roughly 10 points softer than the Z-Star XV and a bit more than five points softer than the Z-Star Diamond.

Similar compression balls in the marketplace include Bridgestone Tour B XS and Titleist Tour Speed.

Compression Comparison Chart

We’ve had requests for a standalone compression comparison tool. As it turns out, that tool exists. We created it as part of our Golf Ball Compression FAQ page. At some point, we may merge the two charts but, for now, the plan is to include this chart in future Ball Labs.

Diameter and Weight

A 2023 Srixon Z-Star golf ball being weighted for Ball Lab.

All the balls in our 2023 Srixon Z-Star sample were USGA conforming for both size and weight.

A single ball in the sample failed to meet our standard of roundness and was flagged as bad.

a ball lab price summary for the 2023 srixon z-star

Srixon Z-Star – Inspection

Centeredness and Concentricity

A Srixon Z-Star with a conecnetricyt defect

While most of the concentricity issues were minor, we found one issue significant enough to warrant flagging the ball as bad (see above).

Core Consistency

Core color was generally consistent (differences in the photos are the result of lighting) although the balls had bits of regrind (those bits of yellow and white you see in the photo above), we’ve come to expect from Srixon. We did observe a streak of blue in a single core. It’s likely the result of materials not being completely mixed.

Since nothing was out of the ordinary on the gauges, we did not flag the ball.

Cover

No cover defects were identified.

Srixon Z-Star – Consistency

In this section, we detail the consistency of the 2023 Srixon Z-Star. Our consistency metrics provide a measure of how similar the balls in our sample were to one another relative to all of the models we’ve tested to date.

A chart showing measurements for all of the balls in the Srixon Z-Star sample

Weight Consistency

  • Weight consistency for the 2023 Srixon Z-Star fell within the Average range.
  • Weight was generally consistent from one box to the next.

Diameter Consistency

  • Diameter consistency falls within the Average range.
  • While the last ball in Box 3 is a bit of an outlier, size is within the allowable limits.

Compression Consistency

  • Compression consistency for the 2023 Srixon Z-Star Tour falls at the high end of the Average range.
  • The balls in Box 3 were a bit softer than Boxes 1 and 2.
  • The compression delta across the sample was seven points which is very good.

True Price

True Price is how we quantify the quality of a golf ball. It's a projection of what you'd have to spend to ensure you get 12 good balls.

The True Price will always be equal to or greater than the retail price. The greater the difference between the retail price and the True Price, the more you should be concerned about the quality of the ball.

2023 Srixon Z-Star Tour – Golf Ball Quality Summary

To learn more about our test process, how we define “Bad” balls and our True Price metric, check out our About MyGolfSpy Ball Lab page.

Other than a narrow compression delta, nothing stands out as particular good about the 2023 Srixon Z-Star from a quality/consistency standpoint.

That said, it’s no worse than average in every respect and, while it’s not on the level of the best balls we test, there aren’t any red flags here that should dissuade you from considering it should it fit your game.

The Good

  • Average quality across the board
  • Narrow seven-point compression delta

The Bad

  • One ball in the sample not round (a not entirely uncommon occurrence in our Srixon tests).
  • A single layer concentricity defect.

The Score

The True Price for the Srixon Z-Star is $50.81. That’s a six-percent increase over the retail price of $47.99

At the time of testing, the 2023 Srixon Z-Star receives a Ball Lab score of 75. That’s one point above the current database.

a ball lab summary chart for the 2023 srixon z-star golf ball

Support Unbiased Testing.

DID YOU KNOW: If only 1% of MyGolfSpy readers donated $25, we would be able to become completely independent in 12-months. With every donation, you create change.

Would you be willing to help by giving a donation? Every dollar will help. Make a donation to support our independent and expert golf equipment research. A PayPal account is not required in order to donate.

Donate to MGS


Amount

Frequency

For You

For You

Best Spiked Golf Shoes Best Spiked Golf Shoes
Buyer's Guides
Apr 26, 2024
Best Spiked Golf Shoes of 2024
Golf Balls
Apr 26, 2024
Ball Lab: Callaway Chrome Tour 2024
News
Apr 26, 2024
Why You Need to Book a Links Golf Trip Across the Pond
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Christopher

      10 months ago

      Soft in the range of balls played on tour, but MGS test a few marshmallows too and they’re not played on tour.

      Reply

      Brian

      10 months ago

      I love MGS. LOVE it.

      But your Tableau embedded is truly one of the worst UIs in golf media.

      The mobile experience with the charts is godawful.

      Reply

      Graham bell

      10 months ago

      I had the same experience with z stars so changed to taylormade tour response balls last a lot longer

      Reply

      Zach West

      10 months ago

      Overall I really like the Z-Star. Would have expected a little bit higher score. Thanks MGS for the reviews. Now we need the Titleist ProV1X Left Dash for 23!

      Reply

      Tim

      10 months ago

      I love the ball lab but a lot of the writings are confusing. “On our gauge, the 2023 Srixon Z-Star measures 85 compression, making it the softest Z-Star we’ve measured to date (the prior version clocked in at 87). While we’d classify that as “firm” overall, it’s relatively soft by tour ball standards.”

      Why is it FIRM overall but soft by tour standards….isnt the TOUR the standard setter? what else do you measure against?

      “The Good
      Average quality across the board”

      you cant use GOOD and AVERAGE in the same sentence and expect clarity on the subject.

      dont get me wrong….best testing in the business, but some stuff is confusing to the average reader

      Reply

      MJ

      10 months ago

      MGS, pls. fix your grids so that they work in FireFox! Any time I click on anything, I get “unexpected error.”

      Reply

      Da Slammer

      10 months ago

      Firefox? What year is this, 1999?
      lol

      Reply

      Dr Tee

      10 months ago

      I’ve been playing the Z Star XV yellow and white Divide and the Titleist Tour Speed for the last year and a half. Both are almost indistinguishable in terms of performance and durability–carefully selected spin and flight with launch monitor. The Z Star feels slightly firmer off the tee and certainly does have the “built-in” bonus of the Divide feature for putting alignment. Also–easy to tell which ball is mine in the fairway or on green when partners are playing either full yellow or white balls. Frankly, I have found the Divide easier to find on errant shots.

      Reply

      Sandsavekc

      10 months ago

      I have played the Srixon ZStar line up of balls for about 4 yrs now. The Black Diamond is definitely the better ball for me. Readily available in my area at a reasonable price. What I found was off the tee with the ZStar was just a little more spiny than what I needed. Great ball flight and great off the irons and wedges. I absolutely love the ZSTAR line up

      Reply

      Mark Hunter

      10 months ago

      I bought multiple boxes of Z Star balls on sale last year and if I played one long enough without losing, the cover begins to crack at what appears to be a seam in a perfect circle all the way around. Wasn’t just one box, all showed signs of the same defect.

      Reply

      Da Slammer

      10 months ago

      That’s the problem I had with these. I’m a real cruncher and the seam would show within 9 holes, and I would have to swap them out if I was playing a competitive match.
      They’re not good. But I think that’s why they give you the deal.
      Won’t be playing them any more. Too expensive to be replacing them every 9 holes

      Reply

      Rylan

      10 months ago

      Yep same for me. I’ve played all 3 models of Z Stars over the last few years, and they all start to show the seam line in just a few holes. I really like the performance of the balls, but the durability of them is a real turn off.

      Reply

      Tom S

      10 months ago

      The homepage says “Maxfli’s firmest tour ball” … huh?

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Best Spiked Golf Shoes Best Spiked Golf Shoes
    Buyer's Guides
    Apr 26, 2024
    Best Spiked Golf Shoes of 2024
    Golf Balls
    Apr 26, 2024
    Ball Lab: Callaway Chrome Tour 2024
    News
    Apr 26, 2024
    Why You Need to Book a Links Golf Trip Across the Pond
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.