Ball Lab: VICE Pro Zero Golf Ball Review
Golf Balls

Ball Lab: VICE Pro Zero Golf Ball Review

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Ball Lab: VICE Pro Zero Golf Ball Review

MyGolfSpy Ball Lab is where we quantify the quality and consistency of golf balls. Today, we’re reviewing the Vice Pro Zero. To learn more about our test process, click here.

About the VICE Pro Zero

The Vice Pro Zero is an anomaly in VICE’s urethane lineup. Unlike the Foremost-made Pro, Pro Plus, and Pro Soft, the Pro Zero is made in Vietnam by Feng Tay.

With that, it’s reasonable to expect a dip in quality from VICE’s other offerings and, quite frankly, the Pro Zero caught our attention because of apparent similarities to the less-than-stellar Spalding SD Tour (also produced by Feng Tay).

While we can’t be certain, it’s likely the Pro Zero was created to serve as a value-priced alternative (and COVID supply chain workaround) to what I suppose we should describe as VICE’s premium offerings.

The Vice Pro Zero golf ball in the MyGolfSpy Diameter gauge.

VICE Pro Zero Construction

The VICE Pro Zero is a three-piece ball with a 344-dimple cover. It’s the same pattern used on the Spalding SD Tour though it’s perhaps notable that VICE describes the Pro Zero as having a “fused urethane” cover.

Everything we’ve tracked down suggests that’s little more than VICE-speak that attempts to make injection-molded TPU sound a bit more interesting. Notably, VICE’s Foremost-made balls all feature cast-urethane covers.

Compression

The Vice Pro Zero in the MyGolfSpy compression gauge

On our gauge, the VICE Pro Zero has an average compression of 95. That’s the same as the prior-generation Srixon Z-Star XV and the current Mizuno RB Tour X.

It’s also 14 points firmer than the Spalding SD Tour so while there are similarities in construction and core pigmentation, we can comfortably say they are not the same ball.

Not only does the VICE Pro Zero fall solidly in the firm range but it’s also the firmest VICE ball we’ve measured to date.

Compression Comparison Chart

We’ve had requests for a standalone compression comparison tool. As it turns out, that tool exists. We created it as part of our Golf Ball Compression FAQ page. At some point, we may merge the two charts but, for now, the plan is to include this chart in future Ball Labs.

Diameter and Weight

The Vice Pro Zero golf ball on the MyGolfSpy Ball Lab scale

All of the balls in our VICE Pro Zero conformed to the USGA rule governing weight.

Twenty-five percent of the balls in our VICE Pro Zero sample failed to meet our standard of roundness. That’s a disturbing result. It’s reason enough to put the Pro Zero on your list of balls to avoid.

Vice Pro Zero golf ball - summary graphic

Vice Pro Zero – Inspection

Centeredness and Concentricity

While we observed slight concentricity defects in several balls, only one was severe enough to warrant being flagged as bad.

While we most commonly find concentricity issues in the mantle later, with the Pro Zero, it was uneven cover thickness at fault.

Core Consistency

The Core of the Vice Pro Zero

We found no notable color inconsistencies in the VICE Pro Zero cores.

Cover

No cover defects were identified.

VICE Pro Zero – Consistency

In this section, we detail the consistency of the VICE Pro Zero. Our consistency metrics provide a measure of how similar the balls in our sample were to one another relative to all of the models we’ve tested to date.

A quality chart showing all of the Vice Pro Zero golf balls in our sample.

Weight Consistency

  • Weight consistency for the VICE Pro Zero fell within the average range.
  • While by no means a flat line, weight distribution was similar across all three boxes tested.

Diameter Consistency

  • Despite a significant number of “not round” balls, diameter consistency was in the average range.
  • As the chart above suggests, the VICE Pro Zero is a large golf ball. That’s unusual for urethane balls with Tour-level compression.

Compression Consistency

  • Compression consistency for the VICE Pro Zero was below average.
  • Compression was similarly inconsistent across the three boxes tested.

True Price

True Price is how we quantify the quality of a golf ball. It's a projection of what you'd have to spend to ensure you get 12 good balls.

The True Price will always be equal to or greater than the retail price. The greater the difference between the retail price and the True Price, the more you should be concerned about the quality of the ball.

Vice Pro Zero Golf Ball Quality Summary

To learn more about our test process, how we define “Bad” balls and our True Price metric, check out our About MyGolfSpy Ball Lab page.

A close-up of the Vice Pro Zero

The results of our Ball Lab quality check strongly suggest that the VICE Pro Zero is a golf ball to be avoided. Even at $32.99 (non-bulk pricing), there’s no real value given the inconsistency of the ball.

If you’re a fan of the VICE brand, we strongly recommend choosing one of the higher-quality, Foremost-made alternatives.

The Good

  • Average for diameter and weight consistency

The Bad

  • 25% of the sample wasn’t round
  • Below-average compression consistency

The Score

The True Price for the VICE Pro Zero is $45.68. That’s a 38-percent increase over the retail price of $32.99

At the time of testing, the Vice Pro Zero receives a Ball Lab score of 58. That’s 15 points below the current database average of 73.

Vice Pro Zero - Ball Lab score and summary

Support Unbiased Testing.

DID YOU KNOW: If only 1% of MyGolfSpy readers donated $25, we would be able to become completely independent in 12-months. With every donation, you create change.

Would you be willing to help by giving a donation? Every dollar will help. Make a donation to support our independent and expert golf equipment research. A PayPal account is not required in order to donate.

Donate to MGS


Amount

Frequency

For You

For You

Best Spiked Golf Shoes Best Spiked Golf Shoes
Buyer's Guides
Apr 26, 2024
Best Spiked Golf Shoes of 2024
Golf Balls
Apr 26, 2024
Ball Lab: Callaway Chrome Tour 2024
News
Apr 26, 2024
Why You Need to Book a Links Golf Trip Across the Pond
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Golfinnut

      10 months ago

      I’ve never liked Vice from day one.

      Reply

      peavy steven

      11 months ago

      What amazes me is by now ball companies would be doing their own testing before allowing outside sources test the balls and announce it to the public. That is to say in this case it fell within their own standards,and at that price point buyer beware.

      Reply

      Jay Nichols

      11 months ago

      The price is cheap, that’s not the problem, the quality is poor, but then again, the golfers here all appear to be extremely tight and aren’t willing to pay top dollar for a top quality ball.

      Reply

      Ryan

      11 months ago

      You get what you pay for. I’ve played these extensively and my takeaway is “meh”. The quality is To be expected for a company new to the industry set of German guys importing balls from Korea and sending them to America.

      Reply

      Phil Williams

      11 months ago

      Thanks for the insightful test of the Vice Pro Zero. I was going to test the Zero and bought 1 dozen to test. I will not be testing anymore as the Pro Soft does meet my needs. Thanks again for all the testing you do for us golfers. Good job on a monumental task.

      Reply

      Tom S

      11 months ago

      Is that it? The mantle is thinner at the bottom, and that’s the “concentrity issue”?

      Reply

      Henry Lipscomb

      11 months ago

      I think it’s worth doing a re-test of the Pro Plus. For several years, I had played them and did the epsom salt float test for each ball. I’d spin them and toss the wonky ones. Up until early this season, I estimate an average of 2 wonky balls per dozen. Then all of a sudden, I was seeing 9 or more out of a dozen that seemed off.

      I’ve since swapped to Left Dash and trust they are manufactured properly given their ball lab results.

      Reply

      WYBob

      11 months ago

      Thanks, Tony. I’m curious about what Vice had to say regarding the quality issues with the Vice Pro Zero. It seems out of character for them to sell golf balls with this many quality issues.

      Reply

      Jason S

      11 months ago

      Well, that was disappointing. I had high hopes for this ball, especially at a lower price-point for Vice. I guess I’ll just stick with the Maxfli Tour or if I want to try Vice it’ll just need to be the Pro. Thanks as always Tony.

      Reply

      Will Taylor

      11 months ago

      I hit this ball during practice rounds and move up the Vice Pro during competition rounds. I find both balls to fly great. As long as any other ball I hit. I do think the covers for the Zero arent as tough as the Pro tho. After hotting for a round they may have a few scuffs. Where the pro can hold up for several rounds wo any noticeable damage. Also love the Pro drip balls as they look as spectacular as they hit. And the price is unbeatable. They have a buy three and get one free going on right now. This is a no brainer for me. 108 for Pro drips (4 boxes) or the same or more for Chrome soft, pro V1, or any other higher end ball(2 boxes). Dont like paying more for something that really doesn’t offer and more distance or any more spin on the green. But that is me.

      Reply

      Luke

      11 months ago

      Pro and Pro Plus are great, that would be like avoiding a ProV1 because the Velocity received a bad review

      Reply

      Tom S

      11 months ago

      > While we observed slight concentricity defects in several balls, only one was severe enough to warrant being flagged as bad.

      Would you be able to post a photo of the concentricity defect of a “bad” ball, so we could get an idea of what that looks like? I know you can’t post a photo of “underweight” or “overweight”, but concentricity should be visible.

      Reply

      Tom S

      11 months ago

      To follow up, I’m not sure if the photo (of the ball sliced in half) is a “bad” ball or a “good” ball.

      Reply

      Daniel B.

      11 months ago

      Tony mentions the ball cover being the issue, but in the photo that’s posted it looks like that mantle thins out at the bottom. I’m confused lol

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Best Spiked Golf Shoes Best Spiked Golf Shoes
    Buyer's Guides
    Apr 26, 2024
    Best Spiked Golf Shoes of 2024
    Golf Balls
    Apr 26, 2024
    Ball Lab: Callaway Chrome Tour 2024
    News
    Apr 26, 2024
    Why You Need to Book a Links Golf Trip Across the Pond
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.