Ball Lab: 2022 Titleist Tour Soft Golf Ball Review
Golf Balls

Ball Lab: 2022 Titleist Tour Soft Golf Ball Review

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Ball Lab: 2022 Titleist Tour Soft Golf Ball Review

MyGolfSpy Ball Lab is where we quantify the quality and consistency of golf balls. Today, we’re reviewing the 2022 Titleist Tour Soft Golf Balls. To learn more about our test process, click here.

About the Titleist Tour Soft

a box of 2022 Titleist Tour Soft golf balls

The Titleist Tour Soft fits in what’s generally referred to as the “premium ionomer” category. With prices typically between $30-$35, it’s a category that exists by and large for preference-driven golfers. Most often, we’re talking about golfers who want soft feel and don’t want to spend a premium price but still want a name-brand product.

Titleist Tour Soft Construction

The Titleist Tour Soft is two-piece ionomer-covered golf ball with 346 dimples.

The Tour Soft is manufactured at Titleist’s Ball Plant 2 (urethane balls are produced in Ball Plant 3).

Compression

the 2022 Titleist Tour Soft golf ball being measured in the MyGolfSpy Ball Lab compression gauge

On our gauge, the Titleist Tour Soft has an average compression of 67. That’s all of one point softer than the prior generation, which suggests compression targets didn’t change from one generation to the next. The Tour Soft qualifies as medium firmness across the market as a whole. What’s likely most relevant is that it’s a bit softer than most “soft” urethane offerings but considerably firmer than the softest ionomer offerings.

Diameter and Weight

A Titleist tour soft golf ball being weighed

Somewhat surprisingly given Titleist’s track record of quality, three of the balls in our sample did not meet our standard for roundness. Those balls were flagged as Bad.

As ionomer golf balls tend to run a bit larger than urethane models, as expected, all of the sample conformed to the USGA’s size rules.

Titleist generally doesn’t aggressively push the USGA rules so it’s also not a surprise that all of the sample was safely under the USGA weight limit.

Inspection

Centeredness and Concentricity

We found no notable layer concentricity issues with any of the balls in our sample.

Core Consistency

The core of a 2022 Titleist Tour Soft golf ball

Core color was generally consistent across the entire sample with no unexpected bits in the mixture.

Cover

As is typical with most of the balls we test, we found no notable cover defects across our Titleist Tour Soft sample.

Titleist Tour Soft – Consistency

In this section, we detail the consistency of the 2022 Titleist Tour Soft. Our consistency metrics provide a measure of how similar the balls in our sample were to one another relative to all of the models we’ve tested to date.

a consistency chart for the 2022 TItleist Tour Soft golf ball

Weight Consistency

  • At the time of testing, weight consistency for the Tour Soft fell within the Average range.
  • Box 2 was ever so slightly heavier on average but was otherwise variation was unremarkable.

Diameter Consistency

  • Despite three balls that weren’t round (one per box), diameter consistency for the 2022 Titleist Tour Soft falls within the high end of the Average range.

Compression Consistency

  • Compression consistency falls within the Average range.
  • Box 1 was a bit softer on average than Boxes 2 and 3

True Price

True Price is how we quantify the quality of a golf ball. It's a projection of what you'd have to spend to ensure you get 12 good balls.

The True Price will always be equal to or greater than the retail price. The greater the difference between the retail price and the True Price, the more you should be concerned about the quality of the ball.

Summary

To learn more about our test process, how we define “Bad” balls and our True Price metric, check out our About MyGolfSpy Ball Lab page.

While we don’t love finding bad balls, identifying three in the sample falls within the “average” range. While that’s a bit below our expectations for Titleist, it is still solidly average relative to the market as a whole.

The Good

  • Average to slightly above average across our consistency metrics
  • No layer defects

The Bad

  • Three less-than-round balls are not what we expect from Titleist.

At the time of review, the 2022 Titleist Tour Soft receives a Ball Lab score of 74. That’s one point better than the database average (73) at the time of testing.

Support Unbiased Testing.

DID YOU KNOW: If only 1% of MyGolfSpy readers donated $25, we would be able to become completely independent in 12-months. With every donation, you create change.

Would you be willing to help by giving a donation? Every dollar will help. Make a donation to support our independent and expert golf equipment research. A PayPal account is not required in order to donate.

Donate to MGS


Amount

Frequency

For You

For You

Best Spiked Golf Shoes Best Spiked Golf Shoes
Buyer's Guides
Apr 26, 2024
Best Spiked Golf Shoes of 2024
Golf Balls
Apr 26, 2024
Ball Lab: Callaway Chrome Tour 2024
News
Apr 26, 2024
Why You Need to Book a Links Golf Trip Across the Pond
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Dan Cohen

      1 year ago

      Yikes. Three bad balls is…bad. I don’t play the Tour Soft, because if I’m going to pay more than $30+ for balls, there are plenty of good urethane offerings. But I do play the TruFeel quite a bit, which I think is one of the best all-around balls for the price. I hope the QC on the TruFeel isn’t dropping as well.

      Reply

      Harry P

      1 year ago

      I play the Z-Star. Much better ball and usually available in same price range. Also the Maxfli Tour.

      Reply

      Leevi

      1 year ago

      Will y’all be adding the 2022 mizuno tour and tour x to this ball matrix

      Reply

      Tony P

      1 year ago

      I would be nice to see the spin comparison between balls. I get that this is influenced by your swing, but a standard comparison by MGS with all the caveats would be very nice to see & quite helpful.

      Reply

      Mike G.

      1 year ago

      These balls stink. I found a new one on the 3rd hole, I figured I’d try it out. It wasn’t so bad off the clubs, but around the green the feel was just terrible. Maybe it’s the ionomer, it’s felt like putting a kids toy hollow ball, or a ping pong ball with a little weight to it.

      Reply

      Julian

      1 year ago

      In regards to the upcoming driver tests, I wish you would consider your speed classes. I feel the slow speed is too high. If you don’t want to lower the mid speed, at least give us the average speed of the three classes. This would give us an idea of which area of the class the majority of testers swing. If the average is not centered, the results can be misleading.

      Reply

      Lou

      1 year ago

      Despite 3 bad balls I’ve found the Tour Soft to be a damned good ball. It feels good off the driver and every other club I own. I also have no problem spinning it, controlling it or putting it. I am not going to throw out these balls just because Tony found 3 out of round. I suggest Tony have a heart to heart conversation with Titleist management and learn why these “bad” balls happened. I suspect Titleist has a good answer and the ball may deserve a retest.

      Reply

      Kevin

      1 year ago

      This makes no sense. They don’t “deserve” anything. MGS’s testing procedures were developed specifically to avoid getting a “bad batch” that may require the need for a retest. http://mygolfspy.com/about-mygolfspy-ball-lab/
      “Procurement: We purchase three dozen of each ball model we test at retail. When possible, we source balls from different vendors and at different times. By sampling across multiple batches, we can obtain a more comprehensive picture of quality and consistency.”

      Reply

      Mike

      1 year ago

      MGS crucified Callaway a few years ago (& rightfully so) for the defects in the initial version or two of Chrome Softs. Coincidentally, they invested in better quality control. Maybe Titleist should do the same here?

      Reply

      Tim

      1 year ago

      Wrong! Not a high quality offering.

      Reply

      Tim

      1 year ago

      Surprising for Titleist! I have tried the Tour Soft and Tour Speed. Found both to be too soft for my swing speed and felt I lost distance. Much prefer Calaway Chrome Soft xls, Maxfli Tour x, and Snell MTB x.

      Reply

      Adam

      1 year ago

      Tony you need to get rid of Akismet, it blocks every comment. You are losing subscribers because I sure I’m not the only one that is getting blocked

      Reply

      Chas

      1 year ago

      I’ve been blocked also, with no idea why. I have to agree with Adam.

      Reply

      Whitey

      1 year ago

      I don’t see the true price $ calculation.

      Would like to see a basic performance characteristic , such as ball speed, spin and carry on a mid speed driver in these ball lab evaluations.

      Reply

      Whitey

      1 year ago

      Picture looks two piece to me as well.

      Reply

      Adam

      1 year ago

      Normally, I don’t think anything MGS does is biased. But this is the first ball I can recall that had 3 balls that weren’t round. It would seem the most basic metric a ball can meet is if it’s round. Yet these score better than other balls with no roundness issues. Maybe more weight should be put into whether a manufacturer can make even a round ball….

      Reply

      WYBob

      1 year ago

      Thanks for the Ball Lab testing of the Tour Soft. Curious about what Titleist says in response to 8.3% (3 of 36) of the balls tested failing to meet the roundness test. It seems highly unusual for Titleist to have this type of result in the ball category, especially concerning roundness. Will you publish any feedback they provide?

      Reply

      Bill

      1 year ago

      These balls seemed to have a hard feel off the clubs to me. In this class I really have found the Oncore Elixir to be the best ball for me. Recently, I was given a box of Srixon Soft Feel and found them to feel good of the driver and the irons.. I may be playing these a bit more.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Best Spiked Golf Shoes Best Spiked Golf Shoes
    Buyer's Guides
    Apr 26, 2024
    Best Spiked Golf Shoes of 2024
    Golf Balls
    Apr 26, 2024
    Ball Lab: Callaway Chrome Tour 2024
    News
    Apr 26, 2024
    Why You Need to Book a Links Golf Trip Across the Pond
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.