PXG Allan Putter
News

PXG Allan Putter

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

PXG Allan Putter
  • The PXG Allan features precision-milled multi-material construction, internal polymer and PXG’s pyramid face milling.
  • The new PXG Allan is the first PXG putter to feature a zero-torque design.
  • The PXG Allen will be available on Aug, 23 with a MSRP of $449.99

The PXG Allan putter is going to make some people angry.

Golfers getting mad about new equipment is commonplace these days. Don’t like the new shape of an iron? Rage type about it! Is a company’s Ventus stock shaft not a Velocore model? That slight must be addressed! Should a club cost more than it did in 2008? Someone has some explaining to do!

Those enraging situations are just minor irritants compared with what PXG has unleashed with the Allan putter.

PXG design elements

At first pass, the PXG Allan looks like the other mallet putters in the PXG lineup. Specifically, the Allan’s build is akin to the PXG Battle Ready II putters. The Allan is constructed from milled 6061 aluminum and 303 stainless steel. The stainless steel front of the putter is hollow with a very thin face.

Unsupported, this extremely thin face would feel and sound very unpleasant at impact. To address this, PXG filled the empty space in the head with their S COR polymer, thus improving the sound at impact. Subsequently, they found the addition of the polymer also improved strike uniformity across the face.

That’s a non-ringing endorsement for the PXG design plan.

Replacing the steel with polymer also allowed PXG to position more of the relative head weight near the perimeter of the head. Increasing perimeter weighting boosts the MOI of the putter and the stability of the putter.

Another thing that continues with the Allan is PXG’s commitment to precision construction. Though it won’t be listed as a key selling point for the Allan, the milling quality of this putter is top-notch.

PXG adds milled elements that are functionally unnecessary but aesthetically pleasing. Check out the milled ridges on the underside of the aluminum top piece. They remind me a bit of louvers cut into the hood of a hot rod. They do not need to be there but they make the putter look that much cooler.

But I’m not mad about the Allan yet …

I hear you. It seemed important to rehash the noncontroversial parts of the PXG Allan design before we got to the main event. Let’s take a look at the Allan’s neck.

First of all, the neck is supposed to attach there and be shaped like that. The PXG engineers didn’t get halfway through building the Allan and then, all of a sudden, feel like destroying something beautiful. The neck position and shape are atypical and built as intended. Unlike the cosmetic milling, the neck system was created not for looks but for function.

The PXG Allan is a zero-torque design

The shape and position of the PXG Allan’s neck makes the shaft axis sit just above the center of gravity of the putter. Imagine if the shaft continued down in a straight line to the putter head. That’s the shaft axis.

This positioning gives the putter a “toe-up” toe hang. Additionally, this design creates a putter that has zero torque during the stroke. This means the putter will not open or close relative to path during the stroke, making it easier to return the putter square to the ball and to the target line.

Something about that zero-torque design plan seems familiar.

Addressing the elephant in the L.A.B.

Are you starting to see why the PXG Allan is going to put bees in bonnets? L.A.B. Golf putters also are designed to be free of torque. That’s the big deal about L.A.B. Golf putters and the effectiveness of their Lie Angle Balanced design is the reason that their popularity on professional tours and amateur bags has soared in recent years.

Is PXG is trying to tap into some of L.A.B. Golf’s success?

My first thought when I saw the PXG Allan was that L.A.B. Golf was going to be pissed off. Their anger would be justified, having fought so hard to have people see that their unusual-looking putters were something special. Now that they have some traction, here comes a larger company to lure away potential customers.

There is another way to look at the situation. The fact that a larger company like PXG is making a L.A.B. Golf-inspired design means that what L.A.B. Golf has done is revolutionary in terms of putter design. Bad ideas don’t get copied. Amazing ideas get copied by everyone.

It would take all day to count the number of PING Anser-inspired putters out there.

I totally get how PXG releasing the Allan could be frustrating for L.A.B. Golf but I think that it should also be validating.

Maybe the PXG Allan sucks (it doesn’t)

If the PXG Allan was a terrible putter, most of the controversy would quickly go away. Unfortunately, it is spectacular.

I took the PXG Allan out on the course and made nearly every putt I looked at. If I did miss, it was caused by a speed or read error. Not once did the ball travel down an unintended line.

My previous experience with L.A.B. Golf putters undoubtedly made me feel immediately comfortable with the zero-torque Allan. I found swinging the DF3 and Allan putters to be similar experiences.

I really like how the Allan sits at address behind the ball. The neck quickly fades from notice with the aluminum top element and long sight line, making alignment very easy. Never once did I question where the Allan was aimed.

Impact feel is muted. It’s tough to know for sure if you missed the center or not. It didn’t seem to matter too much, though, since the ball seemingly always ended up heading toward the target. Though subjective, I definitely prefer the impact feel of the L.A.B Golf DF3.

As a bonus, the milled ridges on the bottom of the PXG Allan will allow you to pick up the ball with the “Pick-Up Pocket” on the bottom of the putter. Odds are you won’t need to use them very often, though.

Final thoughts on the PXG Allan putter

The PXG Allan is probably the best putter that PXG has produced to date. Yes, I am including the Most Wanted winning PXG Battle Ready Bat Attack in that ranking. This putter is that good.

Will the PXG Allan lure customers away from L.A.B. Golf? Maybe, but I’m not totally sure that the Allan will prove harmful to L.A.B. Golf. L.A.B. Golf has carved out a very unique market space. They make putters with atypical shapes that undeniably outperform other putters in the current marketplace.

Remember, 8802-loving Phil Mickelson is using a L.A.B. Golf putter.

I can see the PXG Allan being a gateway to L.A.B. Golf. Customers, especially PXG loyalists, will try the Allan without knowing anything about all the zero-torque stuff. Now that they are familiar with the technology, they feel more comfortable and curious about exploring what L.A.B. Golf has to offer.

That’s assuming that anyone would ever want to move on from the PXG Allan. Like I said, it’s a solid flatstick.

Find out more about the PXG Allan and the other PXG putters at PXG.com.

FAQ: PXG Allan Putter

What shaft is in the PXG Allan?

The Allan I tested had PXG’s M16 putter shaft in it. The shaft is made of graphite and steel and is 26 percent stiffer than steel. PXG says robot testing shows the M16 shaft to be 37 percent more accurate than traditional steel.

Is the PXG Allan named after someone?

The Allan is named after Bob Parsons’ younger brother who passed after battling cancer back in 2020. If you are wondering, the Alan Parsons from the Alan Parsons Project was a different person.

Will other companies be releasing zero-torque putters?

I’d say that is a safe bet. The design works and is hot in the marketplace. Expect other companies to release some.

Will PXG put these on sale?

It’s possible. They do run sales here and there. Remember that they also have a PXG for Heroes program where current and past military, veterans and first responders get a discount.

For You

For You

We Tried It
Oct 3, 2024
This Rangefinder is Unique!
FootJoy Pro/SLX BOA golf shoes FootJoy Pro/SLX BOA golf shoes
News
Oct 3, 2024
4 Tips to Extend the Lifespan of Your Golf Shoes
Uncategorized
Oct 3, 2024
Best Funny Golf Gifts
Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

A putter-obsessed recreational golfer, constantly striving to improve his game while not getting too hung up about it. Golf should be fun, always.

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Jim C.

      1 month ago

      I recently tried the Allen putter at my local PXG store. I missed the first 3 puts slightly to the left due to my guiding the putter and not letting the putter do its thing. When I took my hands out of it and just put a good stroke on it, I proceeded to make the next 20 in a row from 10′. I quit for a few minutes and came back and proceeded to make 10 more. I was truly amazed! It looks great too!

      Reply

      Chris G

      1 month ago

      Just tried the PXG Allen and its amazing!!! These zero torque Putter are making Scotty shake in his boots

      Reply

      Joseph Parent

      1 month ago

      Everyone’s talking about the price, however they’ll go out and spend 500+ on a driver with a fitted shaft just to get a few extra yards. Think about guys the putter is the most used club in your bag!!! Guaranteed to be used 25-36 times a round. Putting has always seemed to me the easiest place to pick up strokes. It seems much more realistic to be able to gain 6 strokes a round just by putting better (although chipping well is a big part of putting well too!!!). So let’s forget about price and start thinking results! I personally have been fighting the “YIPS” for the last 5 years. I have literally tried everything, grips, both hands and putter ends. I have 2 L.A.B. Putters, a Mez Max 1, and a MEz Max 1 broomstick, I have an EVNROLL Neo classic ER2. I have had an Axis putter. I haver tried the EvnRoll Zero putter, all to no avail, the “YIPS” are still there. Lately I started putting left handed and that is working pretty good. No YIPS! Yes I am working on distance and speed, so I consider it a work in progress. I have been working with Taylormade, Odyssey, and Wilson left handed putters not trying to break the bank to see if this is a worthwhile effort or not, still trying to determine if left handed I am more of an arc putter or a straight back and through, like I am right handed. It appears that lefty is more of an arc stroke and it feels very natural. I love the fact that the Allan and L.A.B. Putters basically say your stroke path doesn’t matter that the putter head will stay square. I hope to get an opportunity to try both in a left handed version to see if these might be the answer.

      Reply

      Charles P

      1 month ago

      To me this seems closer to the Axis1 zero-torque putter designs than the L.A.B. design. I game the Axis1 Tour HM putter now and tried the original L.A.B. DF2.1 in the past. Axis1 putters are also “toe up” balanced, whereas the L.A.B. putters achieve zero-torque mostly through customized lie angles and putterhead weighting. The Allan design does do a better job of hiding the unique neck than the Axis1 putters (they’re meant for the shaft to meet head CG at the face of the putter, which is why their hosels protrude past the face), but the premise appears the same.

      I’d think that Axis1 would be the company most bothered by the Allan since their polarizing hosel design hasn’t caught on at a L.A.B. or PXG level…

      Reply

      CB

      1 month ago

      Excellent write up Dave! I tried a LAB and wasn’t too sold on it, partially because of the aesthetics, but the PXG looks relatively sharp by comparison. Maybe EVNROLL will also jump into the zero torque pool, and then I’d be even more interested.

      Reply

      Joe

      1 month ago

      I’m definitely intrigued by this putter! I’ve tried a LAB DF2.1 and hated the look, size, and feel of it and eventually sold it… I tinker with putters quite often and have been experimenting with LAB’s Link.1 lately. It’s the best looking and feeling putter by far that LAB manufactures (at least in my humble opinion)! I think in terms of looks, this putter crushes any and all LAB putters available now, which gives me hope that LAB can design a normal looking putter in the future (if PXG can do it and still maintain zero-torque so can LAB).

      I’d be more open to testing this putter once it goes on sale or if I can find one used. $500+ dollars is a tough pill to swallow if it doesn’t perform as expected.

      Reply

      Dave R

      1 month ago

      I’ve been wondering when the LAB philosophy would seep into other brands. I think it was really smart for PXG to blend that tech with the aesthetic of one of the most popular putters out there in the Spider. Fascinated to see how this one performs and if they get a bump from being the first mover in the LAB but not LAB space.

      Reply

      Kuso

      1 month ago

      HUGE difference between LAB and the other putters is the GRIP on the LABs. That sort of perpendicularly, “side-ways” installed oval-shaped grip aligned with the face on LABs is definitely different to the others that make the LAB what it is

      Reply

      Phill S.

      1 month ago

      Have you forgotten that LAB putters stole the torque-free idea from Axis1?

      There are very few new technologies in the golf industry. Need a few more examples? How about Bloodlines stand up putter? There was a version of that back in the 1980’s (for the life of me, I can’t remember the brand name). Then Taylormade’s driver with a graphite face – remember the Callaway C4 driver? Adams golf’s new putter with the half moon groves started by Yes golf. I am sure there are many more examples the community can suggest as well.

      Getting back to Axis1, LAB, and PXG, as long as there is enough variation, Copyright infringement is not violated and we all benefit (or shake our heads in disbelief).

      Reply

      John

      1 month ago

      Well written article. However, spending that kind of money a fitting at a pxg store would be in order.

      Reply

      Kevin C

      1 month ago

      I’d have to try it and see if I actually putted better with it, but this is the first zero torque putter that I like the look of. The Lab putter almost swung itself, but I felt like it had no real sightline for me.

      Reply

      vito

      1 month ago

      At the price points for these putters I don’t think it matters. A relatively small percentage(read rich upper middle folks or just dumb people) will be the market for either of these putters. True knock offs will come if/when the rest of the big boys start using this design philosophy. Then you’ll see the Diamond Tour Golf, Value Golf and others producing $95 versions.

      Reply

      Garrett

      1 month ago

      I think calling people dumb because they can afford an expensive putter that can last a lifetime petty and dumb.

      Reply

      Golfer XY

      1 month ago

      I would say there aren’t too many dumb people who are “rich upper middle folks”, but if there are I must be one of them. I’ve purchased 3, count ’em, three LAB putters and loved all three. Circumstances required that I give up my first, a Mezz Max, and I replaced it with a Mezz Broomstick. I putted very well with that, but when the DF3 came out I had a chance to try one on a practice green and dang it I was hooked. Best putter ever for me, period…and it’s not even close.
      Keep working at it Vito! I would say that you’re half way there.

      Reply

      Mike

      1 month ago

      What big boys? Scotty’s already cost that much & most of the OEM new putters aren’t far behind.

      “New” golf equipment is expensive. Accept that fact & move along.

      Reply

      Ken

      1 month ago

      “They make putters with atypical shapes that undeniably outperform other putters in the current marketplace.
      Remember, 8802-loving Phil Mickelson is using a L.A.B. Golf putter.”. Do they really? L.A.B. putters have actually done rather poorly in all the testing you have done. Are we not supposed believe the testing results?

      Reply

      Garrett

      1 month ago

      Or maybe the testers hadn’t learned how to properly swing the LAB yet? They were likely using their torque-compensating swing on a zero-torque putter.

      Just saying.

      Reply

      Mike

      1 month ago

      I bought an LAB putter direct from them (spoke to them on the phone & was fitted on using my phone). Not once did any of them say I had to “learn how to putt” with it. Tell me, what did I (& surely others) miss?

      Mike

      1 month ago

      Thank you chris. It’s an interesting concept, I have a LED putter for two seasons, it worked great the first and terrible the second. It just felt extremely heavy. I’d be curious to try this, although the price tag is a little bit put-offish. I really would have to make every put in sight to spend close to $500 on a putter. I realize that’s probably close to the going price of Scotty’s & LAB’s, But I’d have to really justify how many more putts I would make for that kind of coin.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    We Tried It
    Oct 3, 2024
    This Rangefinder is Unique!
    FootJoy Pro/SLX BOA golf shoes FootJoy Pro/SLX BOA golf shoes
    News
    Oct 3, 2024
    4 Tips to Extend the Lifespan of Your Golf Shoes
    Uncategorized
    Oct 3, 2024
    Best Funny Golf Gifts