We Asked 100 Golfers Their Thoughts on Kirkland Golf Clubs
News

We Asked 100 Golfers Their Thoughts on Kirkland Golf Clubs

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

We Asked 100 Golfers Their Thoughts on Kirkland Golf Clubs

The popular game show Family Feud is one of my favorites. The idea is simple: poll people on various topics and parse the data for the top answers.

The same method and model can be applied to golf as a way to understand the consensus on certain topics. At this scale and sample, it’s not fair of us to apply the results to the overall population. That said, it gives us an easy and quick assessment that can be indicative of results we might see on a larger scale.

Take, for example, Kirkland Golf Clubs. With the introduction of the Kirkland Signature Driver and Kirkland Signature Irons, I wanted an easy way to assess how golfers really feel about what Kirkland is doing.

As such, I conducted a survey and have parsed through the data to provide you with a succinct breakdown of what golfers feel and think about Kirkland golf clubs. Here’s what I found.

Demographics

Respondents to the survey (conducted via the MyGolfSpy Forum) ranged in handicap from 0 (scratch) to 28.5. The majority of respondents (50.3 percent) reported that they play golf several times per week, with 40.5 percent playing multiple times per month.

With this in mind, let’s dive into some of the top answers.

What are your thoughts on the Kirkland Signature irons?

We asked 100 golfers to give us their thoughts on the new Kirkland Signature irons. After collecting the responses, I parsed through the data using a Natural Language Toolkit via Python. From here, I was able to filter responses to extract the adjectives that appeared most frequently across all responses.

The Top Answers are on the Board

Golfers more frequently described the Kirkland Signature Irons as “good” and “great.” Other words that appeared frequently across the board were “clean,” “nice,” “similar” and “sleek.”

While the consensus was that the Kirkland irons are both clean and sleek, it’s worth noting that most golfers we polled found the irons similar to other popular player’s distance irons on the market.

Golfers also described the Kirkland Irons as “classic,” “modern” and “fine.”

Would you play Kirkland Signature irons?

The survey also gave respondents a chance to say whether they would game Kirkland Signature irons. The consensus was clear: Kirkland Signature Irons are gamers.

What are your thoughts on the Kirkland Signature driver?

We asked 100 golfers to give us their thoughts on the new Kirkland Signature driver. As I did with the Kirkland irons, I parsed through the data using a Natural Language Processing Toolkit via Python. Then I filtered responses to extract the adjectives that appeared most frequently.

Here’s what golfers said about the Kirkland Signature driver.

The top answers are on the board

Most golfers shared similar sentiments between the Kirkland irons and Kirkland driver. The word “cheap” stands out for the driver.

Golfers also described the Kirkland Signature driver as “brash,” “inoffensive” and “generic.”

Would you play the Kirkland Signature driver?

Golfers were also polled to find out whether they would play the Kirkland Signature driver. The results were not as lopsided as with the irons. Nearly five percent more golfers said they would not play the Kirkland Signature driver as opposed to the irons.

What are your overall thoughts on Kirkland golf clubs?

The survey also asked golfers to provide their general overall thoughts on Kirkland golf clubs. I went through the same process to parse and extract the words respondents used most frequently.

The top answers are on the board

Golfers described Kirkland golf clubs as “friendly,” “decent” and good as a “starter” set. Surprisingly, this question was the first time the word “affordable” made multiple appearances.

Are Kirkland golf clubs good for the game?

Survey respondents were asked whether they think Kirkland golf clubs are good for the game. The results are pretty telling of how people feel about having more budget-friendly options.

Practice in polarity

After scraping respondents’ answers for their thoughts on Kirkland golf clubs, I also conducted a full sentiment analysis in Python using a Sentiment Intensity Analyzer. Basically, this tool assigns each response a polarity score of 1 (positive) 0 (neutral) or -1 (negative) based on its contents. Most answers are not fully positive, neutral or negative. Often they contain a combination of the three.

For example, one respondent described the Kirkland Irons as “budget friendly, sleek, game improvement.” The Sentiment Intensity Analyzer assigned this response scores of 0 (negative), .326 (neutral) and .674 (positive). The scores are then compounded (.735) and assigned the polarity score based on the following equation: > 0.2 = 1, < -.02 = -1.

Once all responses were analyzed for overall sentiment, I placed them in a graph to provide an overarching look at the sentiment.

Sentiment Analysis: Kirkland Irons

Sentiment Analysis: Kirkland Driver

Sentiment Analysis: Kirkland Golf Clubs (Overall)

Final thoughts

Based on the overall survey results, I think it’s fair to say most people are on board with Kirkland delivering budget-friendly golf clubs. For many golfers (based on those we polled), having an extra-value option is only going to help the game of golf.

What are your feelings on Kirkland golf clubs? Are you in the majority or minority? I hope you found this survey both reflective and insightful.

What should we ask next?

For You

For You

Shinnecock U.S. Open Shinnecock U.S. Open
News
Jun 17, 2026
Will The USGA “Lose The Course” Again At Shinnecock? Don’t Bet On It
Golf Balls
Jun 17, 2026
USGA Acknowledges That The Golf Ball Rollback Math Doesn’t Math
Labs
Jun 17, 2026
Bridgestone Tour B X (2026) Ball Lab
Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor is MyGolfSpy's resident sneakerhead and the authority on all things golf shoe performance. He's tested over 150 different pairs (and counting). When he isn't scrolling Twitter to find his next golf shoe purchase, you can find him at the piano or trying a new dessert place with his wife and daughter. #Lefty

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Pete A

      2 years ago

      I think overall it is good for the game as more people will be exposed to quality, affordable equipment. I am surprised that the irons more of a players club than a game improvement club. In my opinion, most people who are a good enough player to game these clubs will most likely get fit or at least hit them before purchasing. Would have thought they’d go game improvement or at least players distance to appeal to a larger group of players.

      Reply

      Richard Simon

      2 years ago

      I haven’t seen the irons or the driver, but as to the question about warranty, Costco stands behind everything. U tube has a test of the Costco driver and Taylormade Stealth 2 driver. The performance was “almost” identical.

      Reply

      WYBob

      2 years ago

      I like the overall “Family Feud” format you used, but in the end this is just an opinion survey using analytics to parse those opinions based on “feelings” but not actual experiences. Initial feelings may get you to look, but are a pretty unreliable criteria in an actual decision to purchase. Without “hands on experience” with the clubs how can someone say a club is “great” or even “good?” I’ll wait until MGS includes these clubs in the “Most Wanted …” evaluations to see if the Kirkland clubs are worthy of any consideration. Until these are properly vetted, everything concerning these clubs is just plain hype.

      Reply

      Jimmy

      2 years ago

      If you guys are going to keep doing these forum polls, I think the way you describe the sampling pool needs to be more precise. You’re not polling “golfers.” You’re polling MGS forum readers who were motivated enough to click on the link and respond to the survey.

      We should not be reaching conclusions about the general golfing public with these results, and the language used to describe it should reflect that.

      Reply

      Connor Lindeman

      2 years ago

      Thanks for your comment. In the first few paragraphs it states: “At this scale and sample, it’s not fair of us to apply the results to the overall population. That said, it gives us an easy and quick assessment that can be indicative of results we might see on a larger scale.” hope this helps.

      Reply

      Jimmy

      2 years ago

      I appreciate the response. The stakes are admittedly pretty low when we’re talking Kirkland irons. It was more noticeable on the rollback poll results you guys published recently though. Responses were attributed to “our community” or “forum readers” when it’s really not a random sampling of that group. It’s those who were motivated enough by the issue to click on the link and complete the survey. Rollback is a widely debated and polarizing topic, and someone is inevitably going to use those results to support their case that a majority of a particular group of golf enthusiasts is against the rollback, like major golf publications (ahem, Golf Digest) did with the results from Taylormade’s internet poll from earlier this year. Using imprecise terms to describe the group, even if it’s clarified elsewhere, only adds to the confusion imho.

      Connor Lindeman

      2 years ago

      Jimmy, this is great feedback. Thank you. Definitely understand your point, and this is something I’ll gladly take up the ranks as we continue to bring out content similar to this :)

      Frank B

      2 years ago

      They might be decent clubs if you could actually buy them, but they are sold out. Personally, I wouldn’t buy them because they are going for double the price on EBay, so might as well buy something else that is more customized to the player. For example, when I bought my Titleist irons, the shaft weight, flex and length were all custom for my body size and swing speed. I also got to choose the grips. My wife is 5′ 3″, so she can’t play Kirkland irons. Also, the wedges only come as a 3 pack and you get the bounce and loft that comes in the set – I prefer paying more money for TaylorMade gen 4… As an alternative to Kirkland driver, u can buy a brand new PXG Gen 5 driver for $199… Personally, I’d rather have a PXG driver in my bag rather than Kirkland as far as brand/image goes.

      But yeah, if you can actually find the iron set for $400, they are probably a good deal for an average sized golfer with and average swing speed.

      Reply

      CryptoDog

      2 years ago

      They’re great for people who play once a month, right?
      So for somebody who plays every week at least twice and hits a lot of buckets……… would they last? And for how long, and would they fall apart and break.
      What’s the warranty on them? For the irons, do they replace just the one club if breaks, or if it gets lost?? LMAO probably not

      Reply

      Mike

      2 years ago

      OEM’s will replace an iron if I lose it? Or if I break it? Really?

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Shinnecock U.S. Open Shinnecock U.S. Open
    News
    Jun 17, 2026
    Will The USGA “Lose The Course” Again At Shinnecock? Don’t Bet On It
    Golf Balls
    Jun 17, 2026
    USGA Acknowledges That The Golf Ball Rollback Math Doesn’t Math
    Labs
    Jun 17, 2026
    Bridgestone Tour B X (2026) Ball Lab